Age verification requirement for websites with material harmful to minors
Impact
If enacted, this bill will significantly enhance the state's consumer protection laws by mandating stringent controls on internet content directed at minors. It not only raises the standard for how online content is shared but also holds entities accountable for failing to verify the age of their users. The requirement for age verification, however, raises questions about privacy, as companies need to navigate how they collect and retain identifying information, with the bill stressing that no such information should be stored post-verification.
Summary
SF2105 proposes a law requiring age verification for individuals accessing websites that share or distribute material deemed harmful to minors. This legislation targets commercial entities that allow access to web pages with significant adult content—defined as being present on 25 percent or more of their pages. Such entities must ensure users are 18 years or older, utilizing methods approved by the commissioner of commerce to verify their age. Non-compliance may lead to civil action from parents or guardians of minors, as well as investigations led by the attorney general's office.
Contention
Notably, the bill has sparked debate around the implications for user privacy and the operational impacts on businesses. Critics may argue that imposing strict age verification measures could hinder access to legitimate content and impose additional burdens on small online platforms. Furthermore, concerns arise over the extent to which such regulations could infringe upon freedoms of expression and the practical challenges of ensuring compliance across varying internet service providers. As the discussions evolve, the delicate balance between protecting minors and preserving copyright and privacy rights will remain a focal point.
Similar To
Age verification required for websites with material harmful to minors, enforcement by the attorney general provided, and private right of action created.
Geolocation and smartphone monitoring of another prohibited in circumstances, cause of action provided to individuals when geolocation information and other smartphone data has been recorded or shared.