Certain activities regulation by social media platforms
Impact
The bill will amend the Minnesota Statutes to include explicit protections against unfair censorship and algorithmic manipulation by social media platforms. This move is intended to create a more transparent and equitable environment for political candidates and users alike. Notably, platforms that fail to comply may face significant fines, particularly for violations affecting candidates for statewide office, which can accumulate daily until compliance is met.
Summary
SF2269 aims to regulate activities of social media platforms in Minnesota, focusing on issues such as deplatforming political candidates and applying antitrust protections. The bill provisions seek to ensure that political candidates are not unjustly removed from platforms and that users retain control over their personal information and content. It recognizes social media as a modern public square, crucial for free expression and political discourse, akin to how public utilities are treated under the law.
Contention
There are points of contention surrounding the enforcement of this bill, as it must operate within the bounds of federal law, especially regarding Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which shields platforms from many legal liabilities associated with user-generated content. Proponents argue that the bill is essential to protect users' rights, while opponents may express concerns over potential conflicts with established protections for platforms, which could limit their operational capabilities or impose undue compliance burdens.
Political activities by foreign-influenced corporations prohibition; certifications of compliance requirement; candidates acceptance of certain contributions prohibition
Political activities by foreign-influenced corporations prohibited, certification of compliance required, and candidates prohibited from accepting contributions.