Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Minnesota Senate Bill SF570 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
11 1.1 A bill for an act​
2-1.2 relating to environment; modifying permitting efficiency reporting requirements;
3-1.3 improving the efficiency of the environmental and resource management permit
4-1.4 application process; requiring the Pollution Control Agency to issue separate
5-1.5 permits for the construction and operation of certain facilities; modifying the
6-1.6 expedited permitting process of the Pollution Control Agency; requiring petitioners
7-1.7 for environmental assessment worksheets to reside in the affected or adjoining
8-1.8 counties; authorizing local governments to begin reviewing feedlot permit
9-1.9 applications before environmental review is complete; eliminating scoping
10-1.10 environmental assessment worksheet requirements for projects requiring an
11-1.11 environmental impact statement; requiring modification of the state implementation
12-1.12 plan; requiring reports; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2024,​
13-1.13 sections 116.03, subdivision 2b; 116.07, subdivisions 4a, 4d; 116D.04, subdivisions
14-1.14 2a, 2b.
15-1.15BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:​
16-1.16 Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 116.03, subdivision 2b, is amended to read:
17-1.17 Subd. 2b.Permitting efficiency.(a) It is the goal of the state that environmental and
18-1.18resource management permits be issued or denied within 90 days for tier 1 permits or 150
19-1.19days for tier 2 permits following submission of a permit application. The commissioner of
20-1.20the Pollution Control Agency shall must establish management systems designed to achieve
21-1.21the goal. For the purposes of this section, "tier 1 permits" are permits that do not require
22-1.22individualized actions or public comment periods, and "tier 2 permits" are permits that
23-1.23require individualized actions or public comment periods. Goals established in this paragraph
24-1.24do not apply to permit applications required due to agency enforcement actions.
25-1.25 (b) The commissioner shall must prepare an annual permitting efficiency report that
26-1.26includes statistics on meeting the tier 2 goal in paragraph (a) and the criteria for tier 2 by
27-1.27permit categories. The report is due must be submitted to the governor and to the chairs and
2+1.2 relating to environment; improving efficiency of Wetland Conservation Act
3+1.3 determinations; modifying permitting efficiency reporting requirements; improving
4+1.4 the efficiency of the environmental and resource management permit application
5+1.5 process; requiring the Pollution Control Agency to issue separate permits for the​
6+1.6 construction and operation of certain facilities; modifying the expedited permitting​
7+1.7 process of the Pollution Control Agency; requiring petitioners for environmental​
8+1.8 assessment worksheets to reside in the affected or adjoining counties; eliminating
9+1.9 scoping environmental assessment worksheet requirements for projects requiring
10+1.10 an environmental impact statement; requiring modification of the state
11+1.11 implementation plan; requiring reports; appropriating money; amending Minnesota
12+1.12 Statutes 2024, sections 15.99, subdivision 3; 116.03, subdivision 2b; 116.07,
13+1.13 subdivisions 4a, 4d; 116D.04, subdivision 2a; 116J.035, by adding a subdivision.
14+1.14BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
15+1.15 Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 15.99, subdivision 3, is amended to read:​
16+1.16 Subd. 3.Application; extensions.(a) The time limit in subdivision 2 begins upon the
17+1.17agency's receipt of a written request containing all information required by law or by a
18+1.18previously adopted rule, ordinance, or policy of the agency, including the applicable
19+1.19application fee. If an agency receives a written request that does not contain all required
20+1.20information, the 60-day limit starts over only if the agency sends written notice within 15
21+1.21business days of receipt of the request telling the requester what information is missing.
22+1.22 (b) If a request relating to zoning, septic systems, watershed district review, soil and​
23+1.23water conservation district review, or expansion of the metropolitan urban service area
24+1.24requires the approval of more than one state agency in the executive branch, the 60-day
25+1.25period in subdivision 2 begins to run for all executive branch agencies on the day a request
26+1.26containing all required information is received by one state agency. The agency receiving
27+1.27the request must forward copies to other state agencies whose approval is required.
2828 1​Section 1.​
29-S0570-1 1st EngrossmentSF570 REVISOR CKM​
29+25-02200 as introduced01/15/25 REVISOR CKM/ES
3030 SENATE​
3131 STATE OF MINNESOTA​
3232 S.F. No. 570​NINETY-FOURTH SESSION​
33-(SENATE AUTHORS: HAUSCHILD, Farnsworth, Frentz, Kupec and Hoffman)​
33+(SENATE AUTHORS: HAUSCHILD, Eichorn, Farnsworth, Frentz and Kupec)​
3434 OFFICIAL STATUS​D-PG​DATE​
35-Introduction and first reading​162​01/23/2025​
36-Referred to Environment, Climate, and Legacy​
37-Author stricken Eichorn​1023​03/24/2025​
38-Comm report: To pass as amended and re-refer to State and Local Government​04/07/2025​
39-Author added Hoffman​ 2.1ranking minority members of the house of representatives and senate committees having​
40-2.2jurisdiction over environment policy and finance by October 1 August 1 each year and must​
41-2.3be posted on the agency's website. The report must include:​
42-2.4 (1) for each permit applications application that have has not met the goal, the report​
43-2.5must state the reasons for not meeting the goal. In stating the reasons for not meeting the​
44-2.6goal, the commissioner shall separately identify delays an explanation of whether the delay​
45-2.7was caused by the responsiveness of the proposer, lack of staff, scientific or technical​
46-2.8disagreements, or the level of public engagement. The report must specify;​
47-2.9 (2) for each permit that has not met the goal, the number of days from initial submission​
48-2.10of the application to the day of determination that the application is complete. The report​
49-2.11must aggregate;​
50-2.12 (3) a summary of the data for the year reporting period and assess an assessment of​
51-2.13whether program or system changes are necessary to achieve the tier 2 goal. The report​
52-2.14must be posted on the agency's website and submitted to the governor and the chairs and​
53-2.15ranking minority members of the house of representatives and senate committees having​
54-2.16jurisdiction over environment policy and finance. in paragraph (a);​
55-2.17 (4) a statement of the number of tier 2 permits completed within the reporting period​
56-2.18and, immediately following in parentheses, a statement of the percentage of total applications​
57-2.19received for that tier 2 permit category that the number represents, stated separately for​
58-2.20industrial and municipal permits; and​
59-2.21 (5) for permits that did not meet the goal due to lack of staff, a combined estimate of​
60-2.22the aggregate staff resources that would have been necessary for all affected permits to meet​
61-2.23the goal.​
62-2.24 (c) The commissioner shall must allow electronic submission of environmental review​
63-2.25and permit documents to the agency.​
64-2.26 (d) Within 30 business days of application for a permit subject to paragraph (a), the​
65-2.27commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency shall must notify the permit applicant, in​
66-2.28writing, whether the application is complete or incomplete. If the commissioner determines​
67-2.29that an application is incomplete, the notice to the applicant must enumerate of all​
68-2.30deficiencies, while citing specific provisions of the applicable rules and statutes, and must​
69-2.31advise the applicant on how the deficiencies can be remedied. The applicant shall have five​
70-2.32business days to remedy all identified deficiencies before the commissioner determines that​
71-2.33the application is complete or incomplete. If the commissioner determines that the application​
72-2.34is complete, the notice commissioner must confirm the application's tier 1 or tier 2 permit​
73-2​Section 1.​
74-S0570-1 1st Engrossment​SF570 REVISOR CKM​ 3.1status. If the commissioner believes that a complete application for a tier 2 construction​
75-3.2permit cannot be issued within the 150-day goal, the commissioner must provide notice to​
76-3.3the applicant with the commissioner's notice that the application is complete and, upon​
77-3.4request of the applicant, provide the permit applicant with a schedule estimating when the​
78-3.5agency will begin drafting the permit and issue the public notice of the draft permit. This​
79-3.6paragraph does not apply to an application for a permit that is subject to a grant or loan​
80-3.7agreement under chapter 446A.​
81-3.8 (e) For purposes of this subdivision, "permit professional" means an individual not​
82-3.9employed by the Pollution Control Agency who:​
83-3.10 (1) has a professional license issued by the state of Minnesota in the subject area of the​
84-3.11permit;​
85-3.12 (2) has at least ten years of experience in the subject area of the permit; and​
86-3.13 (3) abides by the duty of candor applicable to employees of the Pollution Control Agency​
87-3.14under agency rules and complies with all applicable requirements under chapter 326.​
88-3.15 (f) Upon the agency's request, an applicant relying on a permit professional must​
89-3.16participate in a meeting with the agency before submitting an application:​
90-3.17 (1) at least two weeks prior to the preapplication meeting, the applicant must submit at​
91-3.18least the following:​
92-3.19 (i) project description, including, but not limited to, scope of work, primary emissions​
93-3.20points, discharge outfalls, and water intake points;​
94-3.21 (ii) location of the project, including county, municipality, and location on the site;​
95-3.22 (iii) business schedule for project completion; and​
96-3.23 (iv) other information requested by the agency at least four weeks prior to the scheduled​
97-3.24meeting; and​
98-3.25 (2) during the preapplication meeting, the agency shall must provide for the applicant​
99-3.26at least the following:​
100-3.27 (i) an overview of the permit review program;​
101-3.28 (ii) a determination of which specific application or applications will be necessary to​
102-3.29complete the project;​
103-3.30 (iii) a statement notifying the applicant if the specific permit being sought requires a​
104-3.31mandatory public hearing or comment period;​
105-3​Section 1.​
106-S0570-1 1st Engrossment​SF570 REVISOR CKM​ 4.1 (iv) a review of the timetable established in the permit review program for the specific​
107-4.2permit being sought; and​
108-4.3 (v) a determination of what information must be included in the application, including​
109-4.4a description of any required modeling or testing.​
110-4.5 (g) The applicant may select a permit professional to undertake the preparation of the​
111-4.6permit application and draft permit.​
112-4.7 (h) If a preapplication meeting was held, the agency shall must, within seven business​
113-4.8days of receipt of an application, notify the applicant and submitting permit professional​
114-4.9that the application is complete or is denied, specifying the deficiencies of the application.​
115-4.10 (i) Upon receipt of notice that the application is complete, the permit professional shall​
116-4.11must submit to the agency a timetable for submitting a draft permit. The permit professional​
117-4.12shall must submit a draft permit on or before the date provided in the timetable. Within 60​
118-4.13days after the close of the public comment period, the commissioner shall must notify the​
119-4.14applicant whether the permit can be issued.​
120-4.15 (j) Nothing in this section shall be construed to modify:​
121-4.16 (1) any requirement of law that is necessary to retain federal delegation to or assumption​
122-4.17by the state; or​
123-4.18 (2) the authority to implement a federal law or program.​
124-4.19 (k) The permit application and draft permit shall must identify or include as an appendix​
125-4.20all studies and other sources of information used to substantiate the analysis contained in​
126-4.21the permit application and draft permit. The commissioner shall must request additional​
127-4.22studies, if needed, and the permit applicant shall must submit all additional studies and​
128-4.23information necessary for the commissioner to perform the commissioner's responsibility​
129-4.24to review, modify, and determine the completeness of the application and approve the draft​
130-4.25permit.​
131-4.26 Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 116.07, subdivision 4a, is amended to read:​
132-4.27 Subd. 4a.Permits.(a) The Pollution Control Agency may issue, continue in effect or​
133-4.28deny permits, under such conditions as it may prescribe for the prevention of pollution, for​
134-4.29the emission of air contaminants, or for the installation or operation of any emission facility,​
135-4.30air contaminant treatment facility, treatment facility, potential air contaminant storage​
136-4.31facility, or storage facility, or any part thereof, or for the sources or emissions of noise​
137-4.32pollution. The Pollution Control Agency may issue separate permits for constructing a​
35+Introduction and first reading​01/23/2025​
36+Referred to Environment, Climate, and Legacy​ 2.1 (c) An agency response, including an approval with conditions, meets the 60-day time​
37+2.2limit if the agency can document that the response was sent within 60 days of receipt of the​
38+2.3written request. Failure to satisfy the conditions, if any, may be a basis to revoke or rescind​
39+2.4the approval by the agency and will not give rise to a claim that the 60-day limit was not​
40+2.5met.​
41+2.6 (d) The time limit in subdivision 2 is extended if a state statute, federal law, or court​
42+2.7order requires a process to occur before the agency acts on the request, and the time periods​
43+2.8prescribed in the state statute, federal law, or court order make it impossible to act on the​
44+2.9request within 60 days. In cases described in this paragraph, the deadline is extended to 60​
45+2.10days after completion of the last process required in the applicable statute, law, or order.​
46+2.11Final approval of an agency receiving a request is not considered a process for purposes of​
47+2.12this paragraph.​
48+2.13 (e) The time limit in subdivision 2 is extended if: (1) a request submitted to a state agency​
49+2.14requires prior approval of a federal agency; or (2) an application submitted to a city, county,​
50+2.15town, school district, metropolitan or regional entity, or other political subdivision requires​
51+2.16prior approval of a state or federal agency. In cases described in this paragraph, the deadline​
52+2.17for agency action is extended to 60 days after the required prior approval is granted.​
53+2.18 (f) An agency may extend the time limit in subdivision 2 before the end of the initial​
54+2.1960-day period by providing written notice of the extension to the applicant. The notification​
55+2.20must state the reasons for the extension and its anticipated length, which may not exceed​
56+2.2160 days unless approved by the applicant. There may be no more than one extension under​
57+2.22this paragraph of any determination under sections 103G.221 to 103G.2375.​
58+2.23 (g) An applicant may by written notice to the agency request an extension of the time​
59+2.24limit under this section.​
60+2.25 Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 116.03, subdivision 2b, is amended to read:​
61+2.26 Subd. 2b.Permitting efficiency.(a) It is the goal of the state that environmental and​
62+2.27resource management permits be issued or denied within 90 days for tier 1 permits or 150​
63+2.28days for tier 2 permits following submission of a permit application. The commissioner of​
64+2.29the Pollution Control Agency shall must establish management systems designed to achieve​
65+2.30the goal. For the purposes of this section, "tier 1 permits" are permits that do not require​
66+2.31individualized actions or public comment periods, and "tier 2 permits" are permits that​
67+2.32require individualized actions or public comment periods.​
68+2​Sec. 2.​
69+25-02200 as introduced​01/15/25 REVISOR CKM/ES​ 3.1 (b) The commissioner shall must prepare an annual semiannual permitting efficiency​
70+3.2report reports that includes include statistics on meeting the tier 2 goal in paragraph (a) and​
71+3.3the criteria for tier 2 by permit categories. The report is due reports must be submitted to​
72+3.4the governor and to the chairs and ranking minority members of the house of representatives​
73+3.5and senate committees having jurisdiction over environment policy and finance by February​
74+3.61 and August 1 each year and must be posted on the agency's website. If a report indicates​
75+3.7that 50 percent or more of the permit applications received during the period covered by​
76+3.8the report were deemed incomplete, the commissioner must also submit the report to the​
77+3.9ombudsman established under section 116J.035, subdivision 9. Each report must include:​
78+3.10 (1) for each permit applications application that have has not met the goal, the report​
79+3.11must state the reasons for not meeting the goal. In stating the reasons for not meeting the​
80+3.12goal, the commissioner shall separately identify delays an explanation of whether the delay​
81+3.13was caused by the responsiveness of the proposer, lack of staff, scientific or technical​
82+3.14disagreements, or the level of public engagement. The report must specify;​
83+3.15 (2) for each permit that has not met the goal, the number of days from initial submission​
84+3.16of the application to the day of determination that the application is complete. The report​
85+3.17must aggregate;​
86+3.18 (3) a summary of the data for the year reporting period and assess an assessment of​
87+3.19whether program or system changes are necessary to achieve the tier 2 goal. The report​
88+3.20must be posted on the agency's website and submitted to the governor and the chairs and​
89+3.21ranking minority members of the house of representatives and senate committees having​
90+3.22jurisdiction over environment policy and finance. in paragraph (a);​
91+3.23 (4) a statement of the number of tier 2 permits completed within the reporting period​
92+3.24and, immediately following in parentheses, a statement of the percentage of total applications​
93+3.25received for that tier 2 permit category that the number represents, stated separately for​
94+3.26industrial and municipal permits; and​
95+3.27 (5) for permits that did not meet the goal due to lack of staff, a combined estimate of​
96+3.28the aggregate staff resources that would have been necessary for all affected permits to meet​
97+3.29the goal.​
98+3.30 (c) The commissioner shall must allow electronic submission of environmental review​
99+3.31and permit documents to the agency.​
100+3.32 (d) Within 30 business days of application for a permit subject to paragraph (a), the​
101+3.33commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency shall must notify the permit applicant, in​
102+3.34writing, whether the application is complete or incomplete. If the commissioner determines​
103+3​Sec. 2.​
104+25-02200 as introduced​01/15/25 REVISOR CKM/ES​ 4.1that an application is incomplete, the notice to the applicant must If an application is missing​
105+4.2information, the commissioner must immediately contact the applicant, enumerate all​
106+4.3deficiencies, while citing specific provisions of the applicable rules and statutes, and advise​
107+4.4the applicant on how the deficiencies can be remedied., and request that the deficiencies be​
108+4.5remedied as soon as possible. Submission by the applicant of additional information to​
109+4.6correct deficiencies does not restart the 30 business days allowed under this paragraph for​
110+4.7the agency to determine whether the application is complete or incomplete unless the​
111+4.8corrected application is more than 30 percent larger than the deficient application. If the​
112+4.9commissioner determines that the application is complete, the notice must confirm the​
113+4.10application's tier 1 or tier 2 permit status and must inform the applicant of any missing​
114+4.11information that was supplied by the commissioner under this paragraph. If the commissioner​
115+4.12believes that a complete application for a tier 2 construction permit cannot be issued within​
116+4.13the 150-day goal, the commissioner must provide notice to the applicant with the​
117+4.14commissioner's notice that the application is complete and, upon request of the applicant,​
118+4.15provide the permit applicant with a schedule estimating when the agency will begin drafting​
119+4.16the permit and issue the public notice of the draft permit. Failure to meet the goal in paragraph​
120+4.17(a) for issuing a type 2 permit constitutes a final decision of the agency for purposes of​
121+4.18section 115.05, subdivision 11. This paragraph does not apply to an application for a permit​
122+4.19that is subject to a grant or loan agreement under chapter 446A.​
123+4.20 (e) For purposes of this subdivision, "permit professional" means an individual not​
124+4.21employed by the Pollution Control Agency who:​
125+4.22 (1) has a professional license issued by the state of Minnesota in the subject area of the​
126+4.23permit;​
127+4.24 (2) has at least ten years of experience in the subject area of the permit; and​
128+4.25 (3) abides by the duty of candor applicable to employees of the Pollution Control Agency​
129+4.26under agency rules and complies with all applicable requirements under chapter 326.​
130+4.27 (f) Upon the agency's request, an applicant relying on a permit professional must​
131+4.28participate in a meeting with the agency before submitting an application:​
132+4.29 (1) at least two weeks prior to the preapplication meeting, the applicant must submit at​
133+4.30least the following:​
134+4.31 (i) project description, including, but not limited to, scope of work, primary emissions​
135+4.32points, discharge outfalls, and water intake points;​
136+4.33 (ii) location of the project, including county, municipality, and location on the site;​
138137 4​Sec. 2.​
139-S0570-1 1st Engrossment​SF570 REVISOR CKM​ 5.1facility described in this paragraph and for its operation, except for a facility required to​
140-5.2complete a mandatory environmental impact statement under Minnesota Rules, part​
141-5.34410.4400. The Pollution Control Agency must prioritize these permits in a manner that​
142-5.4minimizes the time required to construct and begin operation of the permitted facility while​
143-5.5complying with state and federal requirements.​
144-5.6 (b) The Pollution Control Agency may also issue, continue in effect or deny permits,​
145-5.7under such conditions as it may prescribe for the prevention of pollution, for the storage,​
146-5.8collection, transportation, processing, or disposal of waste, or for the installation or operation​
147-5.9of any system or facility, or any part thereof, related to the storage, collection, transportation,​
148-5.10processing, or disposal of waste.​
149-5.11 (c) The agency may not issue a permit to a facility without analyzing and considering​
150-5.12the cumulative levels and effects of past and current environmental pollution from all sources​
151-5.13on the environment and residents of the geographic area within which the facility's emissions​
152-5.14are likely to be deposited, provided that the facility is located in a community in a city of​
153-5.15the first class in Hennepin County that meets all of the following conditions:​
154-5.16 (1) is within a half mile of a site designated by the federal government as an EPA​
155-5.17superfund site due to residential arsenic contamination;​
156-5.18 (2) a majority of the population are low-income persons of color and American Indians;​
157-5.19 (3) a disproportionate percent of the children have childhood lead poisoning, asthma,​
158-5.20or other environmentally related health problems;​
159-5.21 (4) is located in a city that has experienced numerous air quality alert days of dangerous​
160-5.22air quality for sensitive populations between February 2007 and February 2008; and​
161-5.23 (5) is located near the junctions of several heavily trafficked state and county highways​
162-5.24and two one-way streets which carry both truck and auto traffic.​
163-5.25 (d) The Pollution Control Agency may revoke or modify any permit issued under this​
164-5.26subdivision and section 116.081 whenever it is necessary, in the opinion of the agency, to​
165-5.27prevent or abate pollution.​
166-5.28 (e) The Pollution Control Agency has the authority for approval over the siting, expansion,​
167-5.29or operation of a solid waste facility with regard to environmental issues. However, the​
168-5.30agency's issuance of a permit does not release the permittee from any liability, penalty, or​
169-5.31duty imposed by any applicable county ordinances. Nothing in this chapter precludes, or​
170-5.32shall be construed to preclude, a county from enforcing land use controls, regulations, and​
171-5.33ordinances existing at the time of the permit application and adopted pursuant to Minnesota​
138+25-02200 as introduced​01/15/25 REVISOR CKM/ES​ 5.1 (iii) business schedule for project completion; and​
139+5.2 (iv) other information requested by the agency at least four weeks prior to the scheduled​
140+5.3meeting; and​
141+5.4 (2) during the preapplication meeting, the agency shall must provide for the applicant​
142+5.5at least the following:​
143+5.6 (i) an overview of the permit review program;​
144+5.7 (ii) a determination of which specific application or applications will be necessary to​
145+5.8complete the project;​
146+5.9 (iii) a statement notifying the applicant if the specific permit being sought requires a​
147+5.10mandatory public hearing or comment period;​
148+5.11 (iv) a review of the timetable established in the permit review program for the specific​
149+5.12permit being sought; and​
150+5.13 (v) a determination of what information must be included in the application, including​
151+5.14a description of any required modeling or testing.​
152+5.15 (g) The applicant may select a permit professional to undertake the preparation of the​
153+5.16permit application and draft permit.​
154+5.17 (h) If a preapplication meeting was held, the agency shall must, within seven business​
155+5.18days of receipt of an application, notify the applicant and submitting permit professional​
156+5.19that the application is complete or is denied, specifying the deficiencies of the application.​
157+5.20 (i) Upon receipt of notice that the application is complete, the permit professional shall​
158+5.21must submit to the agency a timetable for submitting a draft permit. The permit professional​
159+5.22shall must submit a draft permit on or before the date provided in the timetable. Within 60​
160+5.23days after the close of the public comment period, the commissioner shall must notify the​
161+5.24applicant whether the permit can be issued.​
162+5.25 (j) Nothing in this section shall be construed to modify:​
163+5.26 (1) any requirement of law that is necessary to retain federal delegation to or assumption​
164+5.27by the state; or​
165+5.28 (2) the authority to implement a federal law or program.​
166+5.29 (k) The permit application and draft permit shall must identify or include as an appendix​
167+5.30all studies and other sources of information used to substantiate the analysis contained in​
168+5.31the permit application and draft permit. The commissioner shall must request additional​
172169 5​Sec. 2.​
173-S0570-1 1st EngrossmentSF570 REVISOR CKM​ 6.1Statutes 2020, sections 366.10 to 366.181, or sections 394.21 to 394.37, or 462.351 to
174-6.2462.365, with regard to the siting, expansion, or operation of a solid waste facility.
175-6.3 (f) Except as prohibited by federal law, a person may commence construction,
176-6.4reconstruction, replacement, or modification of any facility prior to the issuance of a
177-6.5construction permit by the agency.
178-6.6 Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 116.07, subdivision 4d, is amended to read:
179-6.7 Subd. 4d.Permit fees.(a) The agency may collect permit fees in amounts not greater
180-6.8than those necessary to cover the reasonable costs of developing, reviewing, and acting
181-6.9upon applications for agency permits and implementing and enforcing the conditions of the​
182-6.10permits pursuant to agency rules. Permit fees shall not include the costs of litigation. The
183-6.11fee schedule must reflect reasonable and routine direct and indirect costs associated with
184-6.12permitting, implementation, and enforcement. The agency may impose an additional
185-6.13enforcement fee to be collected for a period of up to two years to cover the reasonable costs
186-6.14of implementing and enforcing the conditions of a permit under the rules of the agency.​
187-6.15Any money collected under this paragraph shall be deposited in the environmental fund.
188-6.16 (b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), the agency shall collect an annual fee from the owner
189-6.17or operator of all stationary sources, emission facilities, emissions units, air contaminant
190-6.18treatment facilities, treatment facilities, potential air contaminant storage facilities, or storage
191-6.19facilities subject to a notification, permit, or license requirement under this chapter,
192-6.20subchapters I and V of the federal Clean Air Act, United States Code, title 42, section 7401
193-6.21et seq., or rules adopted thereunder. The annual fee shall be used to pay for all direct and
194-6.22indirect reasonable costs, including legal costs, required to develop and administer the​
195-6.23notification, permit, or license program requirements of this chapter, subchapters I and V
196-6.24of the federal Clean Air Act, United States Code, title 42, section 7401 et seq., or rules
197-6.25adopted thereunder. Those costs include the reasonable costs of reviewing and acting upon
198-6.26an application for a permit; implementing and enforcing statutes, rules, and the terms and
199-6.27conditions of a permit; emissions, ambient, and deposition monitoring; preparing generally
200-6.28applicable regulations; responding to federal guidance; modeling, analyses, and
201-6.29demonstrations; preparing inventories and tracking emissions; and providing information
202-6.30to the public about these activities.
203-6.31 (c) The agency shall set fees that:
204-6.32 (1) will result in the collection, in the aggregate, from the sources listed in paragraph
205-6.33(b), of an amount not less than $25 per ton of each volatile organic compound; pollutant
206-6.34regulated under United States Code, title 42, section 7411 or 7412 (section 111 or 112 of​
170+25-02200 as introduced01/15/25 REVISOR CKM/ES​ 6.1studies, if needed, and the permit applicant shall must submit all additional studies and
171+6.2information necessary for the commissioner to perform the commissioner's responsibility
172+6.3to review, modify, and determine the completeness of the application and approve the draft
173+6.4permit.
174+6.5 (l) If an environmental or resource management permit is not issued or denied within
175+6.6the applicable period described in paragraph (a), the commissioner must immediately begin
176+6.7review of the application and must take all steps necessary to issue the final permit, deny
177+6.8the permit, or issue the public notice for the draft permit within 150 days of the expiration
178+6.9of the applicable period described in paragraph (a). The commissioner may extend the period
179+6.10for up to 60 days by issuing a written notice to the applicant stating the length of and reason
180+6.11for the extension. Except as prohibited by federal law, after the applicable period expires,
181+6.12any person may seek an order of the district court requiring the commissioner to immediately
182+6.13take action on the permit application. A time limit under this paragraph may be extended
183+6.14through written agreement between the commissioner and the applicant.​
184+6.15 Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 116.07, subdivision 4a, is amended to read:
185+6.16 Subd. 4a.Permits.(a) The Pollution Control Agency may issue, continue in effect or
186+6.17deny permits, under such conditions as it may prescribe for the prevention of pollution, for
187+6.18the emission of air contaminants, or for the installation or operation of any emission facility,
188+6.19air contaminant treatment facility, treatment facility, potential air contaminant storage
189+6.20facility, or storage facility, or any part thereof, or for the sources or emissions of noise
190+6.21pollution. The Pollution Control Agency must issue separate permits for constructing a
191+6.22facility described in this paragraph and for its operation. The Pollution Control Agency
192+6.23must issue these permits in a manner that minimizes the time required to construct and begin
193+6.24operation of the permitted facility.​
194+6.25 (b) The Pollution Control Agency may also issue, continue in effect or deny permits,
195+6.26under such conditions as it may prescribe for the prevention of pollution, for the storage,
196+6.27collection, transportation, processing, or disposal of waste, or for the installation or operation
197+6.28of any system or facility, or any part thereof, related to the storage, collection, transportation,
198+6.29processing, or disposal of waste.
199+6.30 (c) The agency may not issue a permit to a facility without analyzing and considering
200+6.31the cumulative levels and effects of past and current environmental pollution from all sources
201+6.32on the environment and residents of the geographic area within which the facility's emissions
202+6.33are likely to be deposited, provided that the facility is located in a community in a city of​
203+6.34the first class in Hennepin County that meets all of the following conditions:
207204 6​Sec. 3.​
208-S0570-1 1st Engrossment​SF570 REVISOR CKM​ 7.1the federal Clean Air Act); and each pollutant, except carbon monoxide, for which a national​
209-7.2primary ambient air quality standard has been promulgated;​
210-7.3 (2) may result in the collection, in the aggregate, from the sources listed in paragraph​
211-7.4(b), of an amount not less than $25 per ton of each pollutant not listed in clause (1) that is​
212-7.5regulated under this chapter or air quality rules adopted under this chapter; and​
213-7.6 (3) shall collect, in the aggregate, from the sources listed in paragraph (b), the amount​
214-7.7needed to match grant funds received by the state under United States Code, title 42, section​
215-7.87405 (section 105 of the federal Clean Air Act).​
216-7.9The agency must not include in the calculation of the aggregate amount to be collected​
217-7.10under clauses (1) and (2) any amount in excess of 4,000 tons per year of each air pollutant​
218-7.11from a source. The increase in air permit fees to match federal grant funds shall be a surcharge​
219-7.12on existing fees. The commissioner may not collect the surcharge after the grant funds​
220-7.13become unavailable. In addition, the commissioner shall use nonfee funds to the extent​
221-7.14practical to match the grant funds so that the fee surcharge is minimized.​
222-7.15 (d) To cover the reasonable costs described in paragraph (b), the agency shall provide​
223-7.16in the rules promulgated under paragraph (c) for an increase in the fee collected in each​
224-7.17year by the percentage, if any, by which the Consumer Price Index for the most recent​
225-7.18calendar year ending before the beginning of the year the fee is collected exceeds the​
226-7.19Consumer Price Index for the calendar year 1989. For purposes of this paragraph the​
227-7.20Consumer Price Index for any calendar year is the average of the Consumer Price Index for​
228-7.21all-urban consumers published by the United States Department of Labor, as of the close​
229-7.22of the 12-month period ending on August 31 of each calendar year. The revision of the​
230-7.23Consumer Price Index that is most consistent with the Consumer Price Index for calendar​
231-7.24year 1989 shall be used.​
232-7.25 (e) Any money collected under paragraphs (b) to (d) must be deposited in the​
233-7.26environmental fund and must be used solely for the activities listed in paragraph (b).​
234-7.27 (f) Permit applicants who wish to construct, reconstruct, or modify a project may offer​
235-7.28request expedited permitting under this paragraph. An applicant requesting expedited​
236-7.29permitting under this paragraph must agree to reimburse the agency for the costs of staff​
237-7.30time or consultant services needed to expedite the preapplication process and permit​
238-7.31development process through the final decision on the permit, including the analysis of​
239-7.32environmental review documents. The reimbursement shall be is in addition to permit​
240-7.33application fees imposed by law. When the agency determines that it needs additional​
241-7.34resources to develop the permit application in an expedited manner, and that expediting the​
242-7​Sec. 3.​
243-S0570-1 1st Engrossment​SF570 REVISOR CKM​ 8.1development is consistent with permitting program priorities, the agency may accept the​
244-8.2reimbursement. The commissioner must give the applicant an estimate of the timeline and​
245-8.3costs to be incurred by the commissioner. The estimate must include a brief description of​
246-8.4the tasks to be performed, a schedule for completing the tasks, and the estimated cost for​
247-8.5each task. If the applicant agrees to the estimated timeline and costs negotiated with the​
248-8.6commissioner, the applicant and the commissioner must enter into a written agreement​
249-8.7detailing the estimated costs for the expedited permit decision-making process to be incurred​
250-8.8by the agency to proceed accordingly. The agreement must also identify staff anticipated​
251-8.9to be assigned to the project. The agreement may provide that, if permitting is completed​
252-8.10ahead of the schedule set forth in the written agreement, the commissioner may retain any​
253-8.11fees that would have been due if the permitting had taken the time contemplated in the​
254-8.12written agreement. Fees retained by the commissioner under this paragraph are appropriated​
255-8.13to the commissioner for administering the commissioner's permitting duties. The​
256-8.14commissioner must not issue a permit until the applicant has paid all fees in full. The​
257-8.15commissioner must refund any unobligated balance of fees paid. Reimbursements accepted​
258-8.16by the agency are appropriated to the agency for the purpose of developing the permit or​
259-8.17analyzing environmental review documents. Reimbursement by a permit applicant shall​
260-8.18precede and not be contingent upon issuance of a permit; shall not affect the agency's decision​
261-8.19on whether to issue or deny a permit, what conditions are included in a permit, or the​
262-8.20application of state and federal statutes and rules governing permit determinations; and shall​
263-8.21not affect final decisions regarding environmental review.​
264-8.22 (g) The fees under this subdivision are exempt from section 16A.1285.​
265-8.23 Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 116D.04, subdivision 2a, is amended to read:​
266-8.24 Subd. 2a.When prepared.(a) Where there is potential for significant environmental​
267-8.25effects resulting from any major governmental action, the action must be preceded by a​
268-8.26detailed environmental impact statement prepared by the responsible governmental unit.​
269-8.27The environmental impact statement must be an analytical rather than an encyclopedic​
270-8.28document that describes the proposed action in detail, analyzes its significant environmental​
271-8.29impacts, discusses appropriate alternatives to the proposed action and their impacts, and​
272-8.30explores methods by which adverse environmental impacts of an action could be mitigated.​
273-8.31The environmental impact statement must also analyze those economic, employment, and​
274-8.32sociological effects that cannot be avoided should the action be implemented. To ensure its​
275-8.33use in the decision-making process, the environmental impact statement must be prepared​
276-8.34as early as practical in the formulation of an action.​
205+25-02200 as introduced​01/15/25 REVISOR CKM/ES​ 7.1 (1) is within a half mile of a site designated by the federal government as an EPA​
206+7.2superfund site due to residential arsenic contamination;​
207+7.3 (2) a majority of the population are low-income persons of color and American Indians;​
208+7.4 (3) a disproportionate percent of the children have childhood lead poisoning, asthma,​
209+7.5or other environmentally related health problems;​
210+7.6 (4) is located in a city that has experienced numerous air quality alert days of dangerous​
211+7.7air quality for sensitive populations between February 2007 and February 2008; and​
212+7.8 (5) is located near the junctions of several heavily trafficked state and county highways​
213+7.9and two one-way streets which carry both truck and auto traffic.​
214+7.10 (d) The Pollution Control Agency may revoke or modify any permit issued under this​
215+7.11subdivision and section 116.081 whenever it is necessary, in the opinion of the agency, to​
216+7.12prevent or abate pollution.​
217+7.13 (e) The Pollution Control Agency has the authority for approval over the siting, expansion,​
218+7.14or operation of a solid waste facility with regard to environmental issues. However, the​
219+7.15agency's issuance of a permit does not release the permittee from any liability, penalty, or​
220+7.16duty imposed by any applicable county ordinances. Nothing in this chapter precludes, or​
221+7.17shall be construed to preclude, a county from enforcing land use controls, regulations, and​
222+7.18ordinances existing at the time of the permit application and adopted pursuant to Minnesota​
223+7.19Statutes 2020, sections 366.10 to 366.181, or sections 394.21 to 394.37, or 462.351 to​
224+7.20462.365, with regard to the siting, expansion, or operation of a solid waste facility.​
225+7.21 (f) Except as prohibited by federal law, a person may commence construction,​
226+7.22reconstruction, replacement, or modification of any facility prior to the issuance of a​
227+7.23construction permit by the agency.​
228+7.24 Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 116.07, subdivision 4d, is amended to read:​
229+7.25 Subd. 4d.Permit fees.(a) The agency may collect permit fees in amounts not greater​
230+7.26than those necessary to cover the reasonable costs of developing, reviewing, and acting​
231+7.27upon applications for agency permits and implementing and enforcing the conditions of the​
232+7.28permits pursuant to agency rules. Permit fees shall not include the costs of litigation. The​
233+7.29fee schedule must reflect reasonable and routine direct and indirect costs associated with​
234+7.30permitting, implementation, and enforcement. The agency may impose an additional​
235+7.31enforcement fee to be collected for a period of up to two years to cover the reasonable costs​
236+7.32of implementing and enforcing the conditions of a permit under the rules of the agency.​
237+7.33Any money collected under this paragraph shall be deposited in the environmental fund.​
238+7​Sec. 4.​
239+25-02200 as introduced​01/15/25 REVISOR CKM/ES​ 8.1 (b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), the agency shall collect an annual fee from the owner​
240+8.2or operator of all stationary sources, emission facilities, emissions units, air contaminant​
241+8.3treatment facilities, treatment facilities, potential air contaminant storage facilities, or storage​
242+8.4facilities subject to a notification, permit, or license requirement under this chapter,​
243+8.5subchapters I and V of the federal Clean Air Act, United States Code, title 42, section 7401​
244+8.6et seq., or rules adopted thereunder. The annual fee shall be used to pay for all direct and​
245+8.7indirect reasonable costs, including legal costs, required to develop and administer the​
246+8.8notification, permit, or license program requirements of this chapter, subchapters I and V​
247+8.9of the federal Clean Air Act, United States Code, title 42, section 7401 et seq., or rules​
248+8.10adopted thereunder. Those costs include the reasonable costs of reviewing and acting upon​
249+8.11an application for a permit; implementing and enforcing statutes, rules, and the terms and​
250+8.12conditions of a permit; emissions, ambient, and deposition monitoring; preparing generally​
251+8.13applicable regulations; responding to federal guidance; modeling, analyses, and​
252+8.14demonstrations; preparing inventories and tracking emissions; and providing information​
253+8.15to the public about these activities.​
254+8.16 (c) The agency shall set fees that:​
255+8.17 (1) will result in the collection, in the aggregate, from the sources listed in paragraph​
256+8.18(b), of an amount not less than $25 per ton of each volatile organic compound; pollutant​
257+8.19regulated under United States Code, title 42, section 7411 or 7412 (section 111 or 112 of​
258+8.20the federal Clean Air Act); and each pollutant, except carbon monoxide, for which a national​
259+8.21primary ambient air quality standard has been promulgated;​
260+8.22 (2) may result in the collection, in the aggregate, from the sources listed in paragraph​
261+8.23(b), of an amount not less than $25 per ton of each pollutant not listed in clause (1) that is​
262+8.24regulated under this chapter or air quality rules adopted under this chapter; and​
263+8.25 (3) shall collect, in the aggregate, from the sources listed in paragraph (b), the amount​
264+8.26needed to match grant funds received by the state under United States Code, title 42, section​
265+8.277405 (section 105 of the federal Clean Air Act).​
266+8.28The agency must not include in the calculation of the aggregate amount to be collected​
267+8.29under clauses (1) and (2) any amount in excess of 4,000 tons per year of each air pollutant​
268+8.30from a source. The increase in air permit fees to match federal grant funds shall be a surcharge​
269+8.31on existing fees. The commissioner may not collect the surcharge after the grant funds​
270+8.32become unavailable. In addition, the commissioner shall use nonfee funds to the extent​
271+8.33practical to match the grant funds so that the fee surcharge is minimized.​
277272 8​Sec. 4.​
278-S0570-1 1st EngrossmentSF570 REVISOR CKM​ 9.1 (b) The board shall must by rule establish categories of actions for which environmental
279-9.2impact statements and for which environmental assessment worksheets must be prepared
280-9.3as well as categories of actions for which no environmental review is required under this
281-9.4section. A mandatory environmental assessment worksheet is not required for the expansion
282-9.5of an ethanol plant, as defined in section 41A.09, subdivision 2a, paragraph (b), or the​
283-9.6conversion of an ethanol plant to a biobutanol facility or the expansion of a biobutanol
284-9.7facility as defined in section 41A.15, subdivision 2d, based on the capacity of the expanded
285-9.8or converted facility to produce alcohol fuel, but must be required if the ethanol plant or
286-9.9biobutanol facility meets or exceeds thresholds of other categories of actions for which
287-9.10environmental assessment worksheets must be prepared. The responsible governmental unit
288-9.11for an ethanol plant or biobutanol facility project for which an environmental assessment
289-9.12worksheet is prepared is the state agency with the greatest responsibility for supervising or
290-9.13approving the project as a whole.
291-9.14 (c) A mandatory environmental impact statement is not required for a facility or plant
292-9.15located outside the seven-county metropolitan area that produces less than 125,000,000
293-9.16gallons of ethanol, biobutanol, or cellulosic biofuel annually, or produces less than 400,000
294-9.17tons of chemicals annually, if the facility or plant is: an ethanol plant, as defined in section
295-9.1841A.09, subdivision 2a, paragraph (b); a biobutanol facility, as defined in section 41A.15,
296-9.19subdivision 2d; or a cellulosic biofuel facility. A facility or plant that only uses a cellulosic
297-9.20feedstock to produce chemical products for use by another facility as a feedstock is not
298-9.21considered a fuel conversion facility as used in rules adopted under this chapter.
299-9.22 (d) The responsible governmental unit shall must promptly publish notice of the​
300-9.23completion of an environmental assessment worksheet by publishing the notice in at least
301-9.24one newspaper of general circulation in the geographic area where the project is proposed,
302-9.25by posting the notice on a website that has been designated as the official publication site
303-9.26for publication of proceedings, public notices, and summaries of a political subdivision in
304-9.27which the project is proposed, or in any other manner determined by the board and shall
305-9.28must provide copies of the environmental assessment worksheet to the board and its member
306-9.29agencies. Comments on the need for an environmental impact statement may be submitted
307-9.30to the responsible governmental unit during a 30-day period following publication of the​
308-9.31notice that an environmental assessment worksheet has been completed. The responsible
309-9.32governmental unit may extend the 30-day comment period for an additional 30 days one
310-9.33time. Further extensions of the comment period may not be made unless approved by the​
311-9.34project's proposer. The responsible governmental unit's decision on the need for an
312-9.35environmental impact statement must be based on the environmental assessment worksheet
273+25-02200 as introduced01/15/25 REVISOR CKM/ES​ 9.1 (d) To cover the reasonable costs described in paragraph (b), the agency shall provide
274+9.2in the rules promulgated under paragraph (c) for an increase in the fee collected in each
275+9.3year by the percentage, if any, by which the Consumer Price Index for the most recent
276+9.4calendar year ending before the beginning of the year the fee is collected exceeds the​
277+9.5Consumer Price Index for the calendar year 1989. For purposes of this paragraph the​
278+9.6Consumer Price Index for any calendar year is the average of the Consumer Price Index for
279+9.7all-urban consumers published by the United States Department of Labor, as of the close
280+9.8of the 12-month period ending on August 31 of each calendar year. The revision of the
281+9.9Consumer Price Index that is most consistent with the Consumer Price Index for calendar
282+9.10year 1989 shall be used.​
283+9.11 (e) Any money collected under paragraphs (b) to (d) must be deposited in the
284+9.12environmental fund and must be used solely for the activities listed in paragraph (b).
285+9.13 (f) Permit applicants who wish to construct, reconstruct, or modify a project may offer
286+9.14request expedited permitting under this paragraph. An applicant requesting expedited
287+9.15permitting under this paragraph must agree to reimburse the agency for the costs of staff
288+9.16time or consultant services needed to expedite the preapplication process and permit
289+9.17development process through the final decision on the permit, including the analysis of
290+9.18environmental review documents. The reimbursement shall be is in addition to permit
291+9.19application fees imposed by law. When the agency determines that it needs additional
292+9.20resources to develop the permit application in an expedited manner, and that expediting the
293+9.21development is consistent with permitting program priorities, the agency may accept the
294+9.22reimbursement. The commissioner must give the applicant an estimate of the timeline and
295+9.23costs to be incurred by the commissioner. The estimate must include a brief description of
296+9.24the tasks to be performed, a schedule for completing the tasks, and the estimated cost for
297+9.25each task. If the applicant agrees to the estimated timeline and costs negotiated with the
298+9.26commissioner, the applicant and the commissioner must enter into a written agreement
299+9.27detailing the estimated costs for the expedited permit decision-making process to be incurred
300+9.28by the agency to proceed accordingly. The agreement must also identify staff anticipated
301+9.29to be assigned to the project. The agreement may provide that, if permitting is completed
302+9.30ahead of the schedule set forth in the written agreement, the commissioner may retain any
303+9.31fees that would have been due if the permitting had taken the time contemplated in the
304+9.32written agreement. Fees retained by the commissioner under this paragraph are appropriated
305+9.33to the commissioner to pay for administering the commissioner's permitting duties. The​
306+9.34commissioner must not issue a permit until the applicant has paid all fees in full. The​
307+9.35commissioner must refund any unobligated balance of fees paid. Reimbursements accepted
313308 9​Sec. 4.​
314-S0570-1 1st Engrossment​SF570 REVISOR CKM​ 10.1and the comments received during the comment period, and must be made within 15 days​
315-10.2after the close of the comment period. The board's chair may extend the 15-day period by​
316-10.3not more than 15 additional days upon the request of the responsible governmental unit.​
317-10.4 (e) An environmental assessment worksheet must also be prepared for a proposed action​
318-10.5whenever material evidence accompanying a petition by not less than 100 individuals who​
319-10.6reside or own property in the state a Minnesota county where the proposed action will be​
320-10.7undertaken or in one or more adjoining counties, submitted before the proposed project has​
321-10.8received final approval by the appropriate governmental units, demonstrates that, because​
322-10.9of the nature or location of a proposed action, there may be potential for significant​
323-10.10environmental effects. Petitions requesting the preparation of an environmental assessment​
324-10.11worksheet must be submitted to the board. The chair of the board shall must determine the​
325-10.12appropriate responsible governmental unit and forward the petition to it. A decision on the​
326-10.13need for an environmental assessment worksheet must be made by the responsible​
327-10.14governmental unit within 15 days after the petition is received by the responsible​
328-10.15governmental unit. The board's chair may extend the 15-day period by not more than 15​
329-10.16additional days upon request of the responsible governmental unit.​
330-10.17 (f) Except in an environmentally sensitive location where Minnesota Rules, part​
331-10.184410.4300, subpart 29, item B, applies, the proposed action is exempt from environmental​
332-10.19review under this chapter and rules of the board, if:​
333-10.20 (1) the proposed action is:​
334-10.21 (i) an animal feedlot facility with a capacity of less than 1,000 animal units; or​
335-10.22 (ii) an expansion of an existing animal feedlot facility with a total cumulative capacity​
336-10.23of less than 1,000 animal units;​
337-10.24 (2) the application for the animal feedlot facility includes a written commitment by the​
338-10.25proposer to design, construct, and operate the facility in full compliance with Pollution​
339-10.26Control Agency feedlot rules; and​
340-10.27 (3) the county board holds a public meeting for citizen input at least ten business days​
341-10.28before the Pollution Control Agency or county issuing a feedlot permit for the animal feedlot​
342-10.29facility unless another public meeting for citizen input has been held with regard to the​
343-10.30feedlot facility to be permitted. The exemption in this paragraph is in addition to other​
344-10.31exemptions provided under other law and rules of the board.​
345-10.32 (g) The board may, before final approval of a proposed project, require preparation of​
346-10.33an environmental assessment worksheet by a responsible governmental unit selected by the​
347-10​Sec. 4.​
348-S0570-1 1st Engrossment​SF570 REVISOR CKM​ 11.1board for any action where environmental review under this section has not been specifically​
349-11.2provided for by rule or otherwise initiated.​
350-11.3 (h) An early and open process must be used to limit the scope of the environmental​
351-11.4impact statement to a discussion of those impacts that, because of the nature or location of​
352-11.5the project, have the potential for significant environmental effects. The same process must​
353-11.6be used to determine the form, content, and level of detail of the statement as well as the​
354-11.7alternatives that are appropriate for consideration in the statement. In addition, the permits​
355-11.8that will be required for the proposed action must be identified during the scoping process.​
356-11.9Further, the process must identify those permits for which information will be developed​
357-11.10concurrently with the environmental impact statement. The board shall must provide in its​
358-11.11rules for the expeditious completion of the scoping process. The determinations reached in​
359-11.12the process must be incorporated into the order requiring the preparation of an environmental​
360-11.13impact statement.​
361-11.14 (i) The responsible governmental unit shall must, to the extent practicable, avoid​
362-11.15duplication and ensure coordination between state and federal environmental review and​
363-11.16between environmental review and environmental permitting. Whenever practical,​
364-11.17information needed by a governmental unit for making final decisions on permits or other​
365-11.18actions required for a proposed project must be developed in conjunction with the preparation​
366-11.19of an environmental impact statement. When an environmental impact statement is prepared​
367-11.20for a project requiring multiple permits for which two or more agencies' decision processes​
368-11.21include either mandatory or discretionary hearings before a hearing officer before the​
369-11.22agencies' decision on the permit, the agencies may, notwithstanding any law or rule to the​
370-11.23contrary, conduct the hearings in a single consolidated hearing process if requested by the​
371-11.24proposer. All agencies having jurisdiction over a permit that is included in the consolidated​
372-11.25hearing shall must participate. The responsible governmental unit shall must establish​
373-11.26appropriate procedures for the consolidated hearing process, including procedures to ensure​
374-11.27that the consolidated hearing process is consistent with the applicable requirements for each​
375-11.28permit regarding the rights and duties of parties to the hearing, and shall must use the earliest​
376-11.29applicable hearing procedure to initiate the hearing. All agencies having jurisdiction over​
377-11.30a permit identified in the draft environmental assessment worksheet scoping document must​
378-11.31begin reviewing any permit application upon publication of the notice of preparation of the​
379-11.32environmental impact statement.​
380-11.33 (j) An environmental impact statement must be prepared and its adequacy determined​
381-11.34within 280 days after notice of its preparation unless the time is extended by consent of the​
382-11.35parties or by the governor for good cause. The responsible governmental unit shall must​
383-11​Sec. 4.​
384-S0570-1 1st Engrossment​SF570 REVISOR CKM​ 12.1determine the adequacy of an environmental impact statement, unless within 60 days after​
385-12.2notice is published that an environmental impact statement will be prepared, the board​
386-12.3chooses to determine the adequacy of an environmental impact statement. If an environmental​
387-12.4impact statement is found to be inadequate, the responsible governmental unit has 60 days​
388-12.5to prepare an adequate environmental impact statement.​
389-12.6 (k) The proposer of a specific action may include in the information submitted to the​
390-12.7responsible governmental unit a preliminary draft environmental impact statement under​
391-12.8this section on that action for review, modification, and determination of completeness and​
392-12.9adequacy by the responsible governmental unit. A preliminary draft environmental impact​
393-12.10statement prepared by the project proposer and submitted to the responsible governmental​
394-12.11unit must identify or include as an appendix all studies and other sources of information​
395-12.12used to substantiate the analysis contained in the preliminary draft environmental impact​
396-12.13statement. The responsible governmental unit shall must require additional studies, if needed,​
397-12.14and obtain from the project proposer all additional studies and information necessary for​
398-12.15the responsible governmental unit to perform its responsibility to review, modify, and​
399-12.16determine the completeness and adequacy of the environmental impact statement.​
400-12.17Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 116D.04, subdivision 2b, is amended to read:​
401-12.18 Subd. 2b.Project prerequisites.(a) If an environmental assessment worksheet or an​
402-12.19environmental impact statement is required for a governmental action under subdivision​
403-12.202a, a project may not be started and a final governmental decision may not be made to grant​
404-12.21a permit, approve a project, or begin a project, until:​
405-12.22 (1) a petition for an environmental assessment worksheet is dismissed;​
406-12.23 (2) a negative declaration has been issued on the need for an environmental impact​
407-12.24statement;​
408-12.25 (3) the environmental impact statement has been determined adequate; or​
409-12.26 (4) a variance has been granted from making an environmental impact statement by the​
410-12.27environmental quality board.​
411-12.28 (b) Nothing in this subdivision precludes a local unit of government from beginning to​
412-12.29review a feedlot permit application for a feedlot subject to environmental review under this​
413-12.30chapter.​
309+25-02200 as introduced​01/15/25 REVISOR CKM/ES​ 10.1by the agency are appropriated to the agency for the purpose of developing the permit or​
310+10.2analyzing environmental review documents. Reimbursement by a permit applicant shall​
311+10.3precede and not be contingent upon issuance of a permit; shall not affect the agency's decision​
312+10.4on whether to issue or deny a permit, what conditions are included in a permit, or the​
313+10.5application of state and federal statutes and rules governing permit determinations; and shall​
314+10.6not affect final decisions regarding environmental review.​
315+10.7 (g) The fees under this subdivision are exempt from section 16A.1285.​
316+10.8 Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 116D.04, subdivision 2a, is amended to read:​
317+10.9 Subd. 2a.When prepared.(a) Where there is potential for significant environmental​
318+10.10effects resulting from any major governmental action, the action must be preceded by a​
319+10.11detailed environmental impact statement prepared by the responsible governmental unit.​
320+10.12The environmental impact statement must be an analytical rather than an encyclopedic​
321+10.13document that describes the proposed action in detail, analyzes its significant environmental​
322+10.14impacts, discusses appropriate alternatives to the proposed action and their impacts, and​
323+10.15explores methods by which adverse environmental impacts of an action could be mitigated.​
324+10.16The environmental impact statement must also analyze those economic, employment, and​
325+10.17sociological effects that cannot be avoided should the action be implemented. To ensure its​
326+10.18use in the decision-making process, the environmental impact statement must be prepared​
327+10.19as early as practical in the formulation of an action.​
328+10.20 (b) The board shall must by rule establish categories of actions for which environmental​
329+10.21impact statements and for which environmental assessment worksheets must be prepared​
330+10.22as well as categories of actions for which no environmental review is required under this​
331+10.23section. A mandatory environmental assessment worksheet is not required for the expansion​
332+10.24of an ethanol plant, as defined in section 41A.09, subdivision 2a, paragraph (b), or the​
333+10.25conversion of an ethanol plant to a biobutanol facility or the expansion of a biobutanol​
334+10.26facility as defined in section 41A.15, subdivision 2d, based on the capacity of the expanded​
335+10.27or converted facility to produce alcohol fuel, but must be required if the ethanol plant or​
336+10.28biobutanol facility meets or exceeds thresholds of other categories of actions for which​
337+10.29environmental assessment worksheets must be prepared. The responsible governmental unit​
338+10.30for an ethanol plant or biobutanol facility project for which an environmental assessment​
339+10.31worksheet is prepared is the state agency with the greatest responsibility for supervising or​
340+10.32approving the project as a whole.​
341+10.33 (c) A mandatory environmental impact statement is not required for a facility or plant​
342+10.34located outside the seven-county metropolitan area that produces less than 125,000,000​
343+10​Sec. 5.​
344+25-02200 as introduced​01/15/25 REVISOR CKM/ES​ 11.1gallons of ethanol, biobutanol, or cellulosic biofuel annually, or produces less than 400,000​
345+11.2tons of chemicals annually, if the facility or plant is: an ethanol plant, as defined in section​
346+11.341A.09, subdivision 2a, paragraph (b); a biobutanol facility, as defined in section 41A.15,​
347+11.4subdivision 2d; or a cellulosic biofuel facility. A facility or plant that only uses a cellulosic​
348+11.5feedstock to produce chemical products for use by another facility as a feedstock is not​
349+11.6considered a fuel conversion facility as used in rules adopted under this chapter.​
350+11.7 (d) The responsible governmental unit shall must promptly publish notice of the​
351+11.8completion of an environmental assessment worksheet by publishing the notice in at least​
352+11.9one newspaper of general circulation in the geographic area where the project is proposed,​
353+11.10by posting the notice on a website that has been designated as the official publication site​
354+11.11for publication of proceedings, public notices, and summaries of a political subdivision in​
355+11.12which the project is proposed, or in any other manner determined by the board and shall​
356+11.13must provide copies of the environmental assessment worksheet to the board and its member​
357+11.14agencies. Comments on the need for an environmental impact statement may be submitted​
358+11.15to the responsible governmental unit during a 30-day period following publication of the​
359+11.16notice that an environmental assessment worksheet has been completed. The responsible​
360+11.17governmental unit may extend the 30-day comment period for an additional 30 days one​
361+11.18time. Further extensions of the comment period may not be made unless approved by the​
362+11.19project's proposer. The responsible governmental unit's decision on the need for an​
363+11.20environmental impact statement must be based on the environmental assessment worksheet​
364+11.21and the comments received during the comment period, and must be made within 15 days​
365+11.22after the close of the comment period. The board's chair may extend the 15-day period by​
366+11.23not more than 15 additional days upon the request of the responsible governmental unit.​
367+11.24 (e) An environmental assessment worksheet must also be prepared for a proposed action​
368+11.25whenever material evidence accompanying a petition by not less than 100 individuals who​
369+11.26reside or own property in the state a county where the proposed action will be undertaken​
370+11.27or in one or more adjoining counties, submitted before the proposed project has received​
371+11.28final approval by the appropriate governmental units, demonstrates that, because of the​
372+11.29nature or location of a proposed action, there may be potential for significant environmental​
373+11.30effects. Petitions requesting the preparation of an environmental assessment worksheet must​
374+11.31be submitted to the board. The chair of the board shall must determine the appropriate​
375+11.32responsible governmental unit and forward the petition to it. A decision on the need for an​
376+11.33environmental assessment worksheet must be made by the responsible governmental unit​
377+11.34within 15 days after the petition is received by the responsible governmental unit. The​
378+11​Sec. 5.​
379+25-02200 as introduced​01/15/25 REVISOR CKM/ES​ 12.1board's chair may extend the 15-day period by not more than 15 additional days upon request​
380+12.2of the responsible governmental unit.​
381+12.3 (f) Except in an environmentally sensitive location where Minnesota Rules, part​
382+12.44410.4300, subpart 29, item B, applies, the proposed action is exempt from environmental​
383+12.5review under this chapter and rules of the board, if:​
384+12.6 (1) the proposed action is:​
385+12.7 (i) an animal feedlot facility with a capacity of less than 1,000 animal units; or​
386+12.8 (ii) an expansion of an existing animal feedlot facility with a total cumulative capacity​
387+12.9of less than 1,000 animal units;​
388+12.10 (2) the application for the animal feedlot facility includes a written commitment by the​
389+12.11proposer to design, construct, and operate the facility in full compliance with Pollution​
390+12.12Control Agency feedlot rules; and​
391+12.13 (3) the county board holds a public meeting for citizen input at least ten business days​
392+12.14before the Pollution Control Agency or county issuing a feedlot permit for the animal feedlot​
393+12.15facility unless another public meeting for citizen input has been held with regard to the​
394+12.16feedlot facility to be permitted. The exemption in this paragraph is in addition to other​
395+12.17exemptions provided under other law and rules of the board.​
396+12.18 (g) The board may, before final approval of a proposed project, require preparation of​
397+12.19an environmental assessment worksheet by a responsible governmental unit selected by the​
398+12.20board for any action where environmental review under this section has not been specifically​
399+12.21provided for by rule or otherwise initiated.​
400+12.22 (h) An early and open process must be used to limit the scope of the environmental​
401+12.23impact statement to a discussion of those impacts that, because of the nature or location of​
402+12.24the project, have the potential for significant environmental effects. The same process must​
403+12.25be used to determine the form, content, and level of detail of the statement as well as the​
404+12.26alternatives that are appropriate for consideration in the statement. In addition, the permits​
405+12.27that will be required for the proposed action must be identified during the scoping process.​
406+12.28Further, the process must identify those permits for which information will be developed​
407+12.29concurrently with the environmental impact statement. The board shall must provide in its​
408+12.30rules for the expeditious completion of the scoping process. The determinations reached in​
409+12.31the process must be incorporated into the order requiring the preparation of an environmental​
410+12.32impact statement.​
414411 12​Sec. 5.​
415-S0570-1 1st Engrossment​SF570 REVISOR CKM​ 13.1 Sec. 6. SCOPING ENVIRONMENT AL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NOT​
416-13.2REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT REQUIRE A MANDATORY​
417-13.3ENVIRONMENT AL IMPACT STATEMENT.​
418-13.4 (a) The Environmental Quality Board must amend Minnesota Rules, part 4410.2100, as​
419-13.5follows:​
420-13.6 (1) to provide that an environmental assessment worksheet does not need to be prepared​
421-13.7for a project that falls within a mandatory environmental impact statement category under​
422-13.8Minnesota Rules, part 4410.4400, or other applicable law; and​
423-13.9 (2) to provide that a scoping process undertaken under Minnesota Rules, part 4410.2100,​
424-13.10must be completed no later than 280 days after the process begins.​
425-13.11 (b) The board may use the good cause exemption under Minnesota Statutes, section​
426-13.1214.388, subdivision 1, clause (3), to adopt rules under this section, and Minnesota Statutes,​
427-13.13section 14.386, does not apply except as provided under Minnesota Statutes, section 14.388.​
428-13.14Sec. 7. STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN REVISIONS.​
429-13.15 The commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency must seek approval from the federal​
430-13.16Environmental Protection Agency for revisions to the state's federal Clean Air Act state​
431-13.17implementation plan if changes are needed to reflect the requirements of Minnesota Statutes,​
432-13.18section 116.07, subdivision 4a, as amended by this act.​
433-13.19Sec. 8. INTENT.​
434-13.20 The legislature recognizes the need to retain and grow the state's economy and vital​
435-13.21infrastructure to keep Minnesota competitive on a national and global level. This growth​
436-13.22requires innovation and creativity, which will be achieved while protecting our environment​
437-13.23and natural resources as prescribed under current law. It is therefore the intent of the​
438-13.24legislature in enacting this bill that the state will meet or exceed efficiency goals, modernize​
439-13.25existing regulatory systems, and communicate clearly to permit applicants and stakeholders​
440-13.26to ensure a predictable, transparent, and fair permitting and environmental review process.​
441-13.27Sec. 9. REPORT ON USE OF AUTHORITY TO EXTEND TIMELINE FOR​
442-13.28CERTAIN AGENCY ACTIONS.​
443-13.29 By October 1, 2027, the Board of Water and Soil Resources must report to the chairs​
444-13.30and ranking minority members of the legislative committees with jurisdiction over​
445-13.31environment and natural resources policy on the number of extensions under Minnesota​
446-13​Sec. 9.​
447-S0570-1 1st Engrossment​SF570 REVISOR CKM​ 14.1Statutes, section 15.99, subdivision 3, paragraph (f), that are made for any determination​
448-14.2under Minnesota Statutes, sections 103G.221 to 103G.2375, between July 1, 2025, and June​
449-14.330, 2027. A local government unit must supply the board with information necessary to​
450-14.4prepare the report required by this section.​
451-14.5 Sec. 10. APPROPRIATION; MINNESOTA BUSINESS FIRST STOP.​
452-14.6 $325,000 in fiscal year 2026 and $325,000 in fiscal year 2027 are appropriated from the​
453-14.7general fund to the commissioner of employment and economic development for the​
454-14.8Minnesota Business First Stop program.​
455-14​Sec. 10.​
456-S0570-1 1st Engrossment​SF570 REVISOR CKM​
412+25-02200 as introduced​01/15/25 REVISOR CKM/ES​ 13.1 (i) The responsible governmental unit shall must, to the extent practicable, avoid​
413+13.2duplication and ensure coordination between state and federal environmental review and​
414+13.3between environmental review and environmental permitting. Whenever practical,​
415+13.4information needed by a governmental unit for making final decisions on permits or other​
416+13.5actions required for a proposed project must be developed in conjunction with the preparation​
417+13.6of an environmental impact statement. When an environmental impact statement is prepared​
418+13.7for a project requiring multiple permits for which two or more agencies' decision processes​
419+13.8include either mandatory or discretionary hearings before a hearing officer before the​
420+13.9agencies' decision on the permit, the agencies may, notwithstanding any law or rule to the​
421+13.10contrary, conduct the hearings in a single consolidated hearing process if requested by the​
422+13.11proposer. All agencies having jurisdiction over a permit that is included in the consolidated​
423+13.12hearing shall must participate. The responsible governmental unit shall must establish​
424+13.13appropriate procedures for the consolidated hearing process, including procedures to ensure​
425+13.14that the consolidated hearing process is consistent with the applicable requirements for each​
426+13.15permit regarding the rights and duties of parties to the hearing, and shall must use the earliest​
427+13.16applicable hearing procedure to initiate the hearing. All agencies having jurisdiction over​
428+13.17a permit identified in the draft environmental assessment worksheet scoping document must​
429+13.18begin reviewing any permit application upon publication of the notice of preparation of the​
430+13.19environmental impact statement.​
431+13.20 (j) An environmental impact statement must be prepared and its adequacy determined​
432+13.21within 280 days after notice of its preparation unless the time is extended by consent of the​
433+13.22parties or by the governor for good cause. The responsible governmental unit shall must​
434+13.23determine the adequacy of an environmental impact statement, unless within 60 days after​
435+13.24notice is published that an environmental impact statement will be prepared, the board​
436+13.25chooses to determine the adequacy of an environmental impact statement. If an environmental​
437+13.26impact statement is found to be inadequate, the responsible governmental unit has 60 days​
438+13.27to prepare an adequate environmental impact statement.​
439+13.28 (k) The proposer of a specific action may include in the information submitted to the​
440+13.29responsible governmental unit a preliminary draft environmental impact statement under​
441+13.30this section on that action for review, modification, and determination of completeness and​
442+13.31adequacy by the responsible governmental unit. A preliminary draft environmental impact​
443+13.32statement prepared by the project proposer and submitted to the responsible governmental​
444+13.33unit must identify or include as an appendix all studies and other sources of information​
445+13.34used to substantiate the analysis contained in the preliminary draft environmental impact​
446+13.35statement. The responsible governmental unit shall must require additional studies, if needed,​
447+13​Sec. 5.​
448+25-02200 as introduced​01/15/25 REVISOR CKM/ES​ 14.1and obtain from the project proposer all additional studies and information necessary for​
449+14.2the responsible governmental unit to perform its responsibility to review, modify, and​
450+14.3determine the completeness and adequacy of the environmental impact statement.​
451+14.4 Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 116J.035, is amended by adding a subdivision​
452+14.5to read:​
453+14.6 Subd. 9.Ombudsman for business permitting.(a) The commissioner of employment​
454+14.7and economic development must appoint an ombudsman for business permitting to assist​
455+14.8businesses of all sizes with obtaining permits necessary to operate in the state. The​
456+14.9ombudsman's duties include but are not limited to:​
457+14.10 (1) conducting independent evaluations of all aspects of permitting processes that affect​
458+14.11businesses in the state;​
459+14.12 (2) monitoring, reviewing, and providing comments and recommendations to federal,​
460+14.13state, and local authorities on laws and regulations that impact businesses in the state;​
461+14.14 (3) facilitating and promoting participation of businesses in developing laws and​
462+14.15regulations that affect businesses;​
463+14.16 (4) providing reports to federal, state, and local authorities and the public on the​
464+14.17requirements of permitting laws and the laws' impact on businesses;​
465+14.18 (5) disseminating information about proposed regulations and other information to​
466+14.19businesses and other interested parties;​
467+14.20 (6) participating in and sponsoring meetings and conferences about business permitting​
468+14.21with state and local regulatory officials, industry groups, and business representatives;​
469+14.22 (7) investigating and assisting in resolving complaints and disputes from businesses​
470+14.23against state or local authorities;​
471+14.24 (8) operating a toll-free telephone line to provide free confidential help on​
472+14.25permitting-related problems and grievances;​
473+14.26 (9) establishing cooperative programs with trade associations and small businesses to​
474+14.27promote and achieve voluntary compliance with applicable laws and regulations;​
475+14.28 (10) establishing cooperative programs with federal, state, and local governmental entities​
476+14.29and the private sector to assist businesses in securing sources of funding to comply with​
477+14.30federal, state, and local permitting laws and regulations;​
478+14​Sec. 6.​
479+25-02200 as introduced​01/15/25 REVISOR CKM/ES​ 15.1 (11) conducting studies to evaluate the impacts of federal and state permitting laws and​
480+15.2regulations on the state's economy, local economies, and businesses;​
481+15.3 (12) coordinating with Minnesota Business First Stop, the ombudsman for small business​
482+15.4air-quality compliance assistance, and other relevant state officials; and​
483+15.5 (13) investigating the cause of permit applications being deemed incomplete when the​
484+15.6ombudsman receives a Pollution Control Agency permitting report under section 116.03,​
485+15.7subdivision 2b, paragraph (b).​
486+15.8 (b) In carrying out the duties imposed by this subdivision, the ombudsman may act​
487+15.9independently of any agency in providing testimony to the legislature, contacting and making​
488+15.10periodic reports to federal and state officials as necessary to carry out the duties imposed​
489+15.11by this subdivision, and addressing problems or concerns related to business permitting.​
490+15.12 (c) The ombudsman must be knowledgeable about federal and state business permitting​
491+15.13laws and regulations and federal and state legislative and regulatory processes. The​
492+15.14ombudsman must be experienced in dealing with both private enterprise and governmental​
493+15.15entities, arbitration and negotiation, interpretation of laws and regulations, investigation,​
494+15.16record keeping, report writing, public speaking, and management.​
495+15.17 (d) The commissioner of employment and economic development must provide the​
496+15.18ombudsman with the necessary office space, supplies, equipment, and clerical support to​
497+15.19effectively perform the duties imposed by this subdivision.​
498+15.20Sec. 7. SCOPING ENVIRONMENT AL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NOT​
499+15.21REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT REQUIRE A MANDATORY​
500+15.22ENVIRONMENT AL IMPACT STATEMENT.​
501+15.23 (a) The Environmental Quality Board must amend Minnesota Rules, part 4410.2100, as​
502+15.24follows:​
503+15.25 (1) to provide that neither an environmental assessment worksheet nor any other scoping​
504+15.26document needs to be prepared for a project that falls within a mandatory environmental​
505+15.27impact statement category under Minnesota Rules, part 4410.4400, or other applicable law;​
506+15.28and​
507+15.29 (2) to provide that a scoping process undertaken under Minnesota Rules, part 4410.2100,​
508+15.30must be completed no later than 280 days after the process begins.​
509+15​Sec. 7.​
510+25-02200 as introduced​01/15/25 REVISOR CKM/ES​ 16.1 (b) The board may use the good-cause exemption under Minnesota Statutes, section​
511+16.214.388, subdivision 1, clause (3), to adopt rules under this section, and Minnesota Statutes,​
512+16.3section 14.386, does not apply except as provided under Minnesota Statutes, section 14.388.​
513+16.4 Sec. 8. STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN REVISIONS.​
514+16.5 (a) The commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency must seek approval from the​
515+16.6federal Environmental Protection Agency for revisions to the state's federal Clean Air Act​
516+16.7state implementation plan to reflect the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 116.07,​
517+16.8subdivision 4a, as amended by this act.​
518+16.9 (b) The commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency must report quarterly to the chairs​
519+16.10and ranking minority members of the house of representatives and senate committees and​
520+16.11divisions with jurisdiction over environment and natural resources policy on the status of​
521+16.12efforts to implement paragraph (a) until the revisions required by paragraph (a) have been​
522+16.13either approved or denied.​
523+16.14Sec. 9. INTENT.​
524+16.15 The legislature recognizes the need to retain and grow the state's economy and vital​
525+16.16infrastructure to keep Minnesota competitive on a national and global level. This growth​
526+16.17requires innovation and creativity, which will be achieved while protecting our environment​
527+16.18and natural resources as prescribed under current law. It is therefore the intent of the​
528+16.19legislature in enacting this bill that the state will meet or exceed efficiency goals, modernize​
529+16.20existing regulatory systems, and communicate clearly to permit applicants and stakeholders​
530+16.21to ensure a predictable, transparent, and fair permitting and environmental review process.​
531+16​Sec. 9.​
532+25-02200 as introduced​01/15/25 REVISOR CKM/ES​