Allows the House of Representatives to review presidential orders and declare them unconstitutional
If enacted, this bill establishes significant oversight for the House of Representatives concerning presidential executive actions. It stipulates that recommendations may be made to the attorney general and the governor regarding the potential unconstitutionality of any given order. This could have profound implications for how Missouri interacts with federal directives, particularly in areas such as public health emergencies and regulations affecting various sectors, including business and agricultural industries.
House Bill 1639 introduces a new section to Chapter 21 of Missouri's Revised Statutes, allowing the House of Representatives to review any executive order issued by the President of the United States. This review applies specifically to those orders that have not received congressional affirmation and signature, as mandated by the U.S. Constitution. The proposed legislation aims to provide a mechanism through which the state can scrutinize the constitutionality of executive orders, especially in contexts where they may encroach upon the rights of citizens or state powers.
Overall, HB1639 represents an assertion of legislative authority intended to curb perceived federal overreach through executive actions. By establishing a process for review and potential non-compliance with specific orders, Missouri seeks to fortify its state sovereignty against federal mandates, raising significant debates over the balance of powers in the American political landscape.
Notably, the bill addresses concerns over executive overreach by prohibiting state agencies and officials from implementing any executive order that may infringe upon constitutional rights or is deemed unconstitutional. This aspect of the bill has potential points of contention, especially regarding the regulation of personal behaviors during emergencies, land use, business activities, and the agricultural sector. There may be pushback concerning whether such legislative actions might interfere with necessary federal responses to crises, illustrating a conflict between state and federal powers.