Missouri 2022 Regular Session

Missouri House Bill HB1656

Introduced
1/5/22  
Refer
1/13/22  
Report Pass
2/1/22  
Refer
2/1/22  
Report Pass
2/22/22  
Engrossed
3/28/22  

Caption

Specifies that no political subdivision can require its employees to reside within a jurisdiction and changes the law regarding fire marshal employees

Impact

Should the bill be enacted, it would amend current statutes that impose residency requirements on firefighters and police officers, particularly benefiting those hired after August 31, 2023. These employees could maintain their primary residence outside their city, provided they reside within a one-hour response time. This change is seen as a way to attract and retain qualified personnel who may otherwise be deterred by strict residency laws, thereby potentially enhancing public safety services.

Summary

House Bill 1656 proposes significant changes regarding the employment conditions of public safety employees in municipalities not within counties. One of the key provisions in the bill is the prohibition against requiring employees of political subdivisions to reside within a specified jurisdiction as a condition of employment. This aims to provide more flexibility for public safety personnel, including police and fire department employees, allowing them to live outside their municipalities while ensuring they can respond promptly in emergencies.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 1656 appears to be mixed. Supporters argue that the bill promotes fairness and expands opportunities for public safety employees, allowing them to live where they choose without compromising their professional responsibilities. Conversely, some opponents raise concerns that this could dilute the sense of community and accountability that comes with having local police and fire personnel reside within the same jurisdiction they serve.

Contention

Notable points of contention in discussions surrounding HB 1656 include concerns from local governments regarding the potential loss of local control over employment policies. Critics argue that allowing employees to live outside their jurisdiction could hinder community relations and diminish public trust in local law enforcement. Additionally, the bill's provisions for public safety employees may raise questions about how municipalities adapt to these new employment standards and manage community expectations regarding public safety.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.