Missouri 2022 Regular Session

Missouri House Bill HB2593

Introduced
1/27/22  
Refer
2/1/22  
Report Pass
3/3/22  
Refer
3/3/22  
Report Pass
3/10/22  
Engrossed
4/19/22  
Refer
4/21/22  

Caption

Prohibits political subdivisions from regulating home-based businesses

Impact

If enacted, HB 2593 significantly alters the landscape of local zoning laws concerning home-based businesses. Local governments would be restricted from imposing ordinances that could categorize home-based businesses as requiring special permits or licenses, effectively removing the necessary governmental oversight in how residents utilize their own properties for business purposes. This means that communities would need to adhere to the limits set by the state, which could lead to clashes between local policy preferences and state mandates.

Summary

House Bill 2593 aims to limit the authority of political subdivisions, such as cities or counties, from regulating home-based businesses. The legislation specifies that no municipality can prohibit the operation of a home-based business deemed 'no-impact' without a permit, provided it does not disrupt the residential character of the area. The intent behind this is to facilitate and support home entrepreneurship by removing unnecessary regulatory burdens, aligning with broader efforts to encourage economic growth and self-employment in residential settings.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2593 exhibits a division among legislators and community members. Proponents of the bill argue from a libertarian perspective, emphasizing personal freedoms and the economic benefits of allowing home-based businesses to flourish without cumbersome local regulations. Conversely, opponents express concerns regarding potential negative impacts on neighborhood dynamics and local governance, fearing a loss of control over community standards and regulations that could safeguard the character of their residential areas.

Contention

Debate over HB 2593 includes notable points of contention surrounding the balance of state vs. local governance. Critics argue that the bill could diminish community input on matters that directly affect local environments and may lead to conflicts in zoning practices. An essential aspect of discourse relates to whether state-level mandates will undermine the ability of local jurisdictions to address specific issues faced by their constituents, such as noise, traffic, or quality of life factors that come with increased business operations in residential areas.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MO HB1662

Changes the laws regarding restrictive covenants by expanding the definition of prohibited covenants and establishes a procedure to remove prohibited covenants from deeds

MS HB1113

Home Business Prosperity Act; create.

CA AB68

Land use: accessory dwelling units.

CA AB2890

Land use: accessory dwelling units.

TX HB878

Relating to the regulation of residential land use and accessory dwelling units by a political subdivision; authorizing a fee.

CA SB1469

Land use: accessory dwelling units.

CA AB2071

Accessory dwelling units: owner occupancy.

WI SB247

Local and private regulation of accessory dwelling units. (FE)