Modifies provisions relating to certificates of birth
Impact
The reformation of the law as proposed in HB2717 intends to enhance the accuracy and reliability of vital records. It specifies that amendments to birth certificates may only be made in accordance with specific regulations and documentation requirements set by the Department of Health and Human Services. This regulatory structure is designed to reduce ambiguity in the amendment process and provide a consistent approach to dealing with applications to change or update birth records.
Summary
House Bill 2717 proposes significant changes to the provisions that govern the amendment of birth certificates in Missouri. The bill aims to repeal the existing law and establish a new framework for how birth certificates can be altered, particularly concerning the addition of paternity information and name changes. By introducing a standardized process, the bill seeks to streamline the amendment process, ensuring that the requirements for making such changes are clear and manageable for applicants.
Framework
In summary, HB2717 seeks to codify a more structured approach to managing birth certificate amendments. The bill includes provisions for amending certificates related to name changes, paternity acknowledgment for children born out of wedlock, and the reporting of amendments to relevant custodians of vital records. The bill's passage could potentially modernize vital records management within the state and increase transparency and accountability in how amendments are processed.
Contention
While the bill is generally seen as a positive step towards better management of vital records, there are potential points of contention, especially concerning the requirements for paternity acknowledgment and the implications of notarization. Critics may argue that certain administrative hurdles could make it more difficult for some individuals, particularly those in challenging situations, to amend their vital records. The necessity for notarized signatures and the involvement of disinterested witnesses might impose additional barriers that could disproportionately affect marginalized communities.