Missouri Senate Bill SB1209

Missouri 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/28/22
• Refer: 3/29/22

Caption

Allows the circuit court in St. Louis City to collect a civil case filing fee of an amount not to exceed $20, rather than $15, for certain uses including the maintenance of a law library

Impact

The bill is anticipated to impact the financial resources available to the St. Louis City circuit court by allowing a marginal increase in the filing fees. This additional revenue is intended to support the maintenance of the law library which serves not only the legal community but also the public. By strengthening the library, the bill aims to improve legal literacy and accessibility for citizens engaged in civil litigation or seeking legal assistance. However, this increase might be viewed differently by various stakeholders — while some may perceive it as a necessary enhancement to local legal facilities, others may see it as an additional burden on individuals already facing financial difficulties.

Summary

Senate Bill 1209 proposes to amend the current structure of civil case filing fees within the circuit court system in Missouri, specifically allowing the circuit court in St. Louis City to increase its filing fee for civil cases from a maximum of $15 to $20. This amendment aims to provide additional funding for specific legal services, including the maintenance of a law library that is essential for public access to legal resources. The adjustment in the fee structure seeks to enhance the operational capabilities of the court and ensure that residents have adequate resources for legal matters. This change is significant as it reflects the state's ongoing efforts to address access to justice and support local legal infrastructure.

Contention

Discussions surrounding SB1209 may highlight a contention between the need for local courts to generate sufficient revenue to maintain essential services and the potential burden placed on individuals required to pay higher fees. Opponents might argue that raising filing fees could restrict access to justice for lower-income residents, who may find it challenging to afford the higher costs associated with legal proceedings. Proponents, including local court officials and advocates for legal resources, would likely argue that the increased fee is a small and justifiable price for ensuring sustainable legal services. The balance between financial sustainability for the courts and equitable access to justice will likely be an ongoing debate as the bill progresses.