Missouri House Bill HB296

Missouri 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/4/23
• Refer: 3/2/23
• Report Pass: 5/2/23
• Refer: 5/8/23

Caption

Prohibits villages, towns, and cities from regulating dogs in a breed-specific manner

Impact

The enactment of HB296 will preempt local laws pertaining to breed-specific regulation, thereby centralizing this authority at the state level. Existing breed-specific regulations in municipalities that were in place before August 28, 2023, will remain valid, but any new regulation introduced after this date will be null and void. This is expected to impact local policies related to dog control significantly, ensuring that local governments can no longer opt for breed-targeting measures, which proponents argue could promote responsible dog ownership and protect certain breeds from unjust discrimination.

Summary

House Bill 296 aims to standardize dog regulations across villages, towns, and cities in Missouri by prohibiting breed-specific ordinances. The bill dictates that no municipality may implement laws that single out specific dog breeds for regulation. Local governments retain authority to regulate dogs generally and may enforce ordinances concerning dogs running at large or implementing vicious dog ordinances, provided these provisions do not target specific breeds. This change in regulation intends to create a uniform standard across the state, giving local governments the flexibility to address dog control issues without focusing on specific breeds as a matter of law.

Contention

Supporters of HB296 argue that breed-specific laws are often based on misconceptions and do not contribute to effective dog control or safety. By limiting municipalities in their ability to regulate based on breed, proponents suggest that the focus should instead be on responsible ownership and the behavior of individual dogs rather than their breed. However, critics may express concerns over the diminished ability of local governments to tailor regulations to address specific community needs, especially in areas with a history of dog-related incidents. This division highlights ongoing tensions between state and local control in managing public safety and animal welfare.