Modifies provisions relating to the disposal of dead deer from roads and highways
Impact
The introduction of HB 404 is set to amend existing provisions in the Missouri Revised Statutes, specifically Chapters 226 and 252. By laying down a structured approach for the disposal of dead deer, the bill is expected to enhance road safety and public health by reducing the risks associated with decomposing animals on roadways. Reimbursing the DOT for the associated costs through the Department of Conservation aims to create a sustainable financial model to support these activities, fostering cooperation between state departments to address wildlife-related issues.
Summary
House Bill 404 is aimed at addressing the management of dead deer found on roads and highways in Missouri. The bill mandates that the Department of Transportation (DOT) is responsible for the removal and burial of any dead deer that are substantial enough to impede traffic. This process involves burying the carcasses on Department of Conservation land at a minimum depth of three feet, ensuring a proper method of disposal that considers both public safety and environmental concerns. This legislative change seeks to streamline the process of dealing with roadkill and minimize its potential hazards on highways.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 404 appears to be generally positive, as stakeholders recognize the importance of effective wildlife management and road safety. Although there may be logistical and financial concerns regarding the implementation of the burial process, the primary focus is on the bill's potential benefits for public safety and environmental health. Legislators advocating for the bill highlight its necessity amid increasing traffic and wildlife interactions, suggesting a proactive governmental approach in managing natural resources.
Contention
While HB 404 addresses a somewhat niche issue, points of contention may arise regarding the financial implications for both the DOT and the Department of Conservation, particularly concerning the reimbursement of costs. Additionally, discussions might surface regarding the sufficiency of the proposed burial methods in preventing environmental impacts or other health hazards associated with roadkill. Overall, the bill incites a dialogue about the responsibilities of government agencies in wildlife management and public safety.