Missouri House Bill HB691

Missouri 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/5/23
• Refer: 5/12/23

Caption

Removes the requirement for the Secretary of State to pay postage for absentee ballots

Impact

If enacted, HB691 would significantly change the state's approach to absentee voting by removing the requirement for voters to pay postage when submitting their absentee ballots. This change is anticipated to enhance voter participation, as financial barriers associated with mail-in voting could be alleviated. Furthermore, the provision for the Secretary of State to outline specific uniform regulations might lead to greater consistency in the handling of absentee ballots across Missouri, thereby increasing overall efficiency during elections.

Summary

House Bill 691, introduced by Representative Davis, focuses on modifying the laws surrounding absentee ballots in Missouri. The bill primarily aims to repeal section 115.285 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri and replace it with new regulations that would allow the Secretary of State to oversee the uniform printing of ballot and mailing envelopes. This initiative is designed to streamline the process of absentee voting by ensuring compliance with federal laws and postal regulations. Notably, all costs associated with the mailing of ballots would be covered by the state through appropriations, eliminating the need for voters to pay postage for their returned ballots.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB691 appears to be positive, particularly among proponents of expanded voting access. Advocates argue that by eliminating postage requirements, the bill helps to foster an inclusive electoral process, allowing more citizens to engage in absentee voting without the worry of additional costs. However, concerns may arise among those worried about the implications of state-funded mailing processes and the potential for disputes regarding election security and ballot integrity.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support for its intention to facilitate absentee voting, there may be contention regarding the implications of state funding for postage and the role of the Secretary of State in determining the regulations for absentee voting materials. Critics could raise questions about the effectiveness of uniform mailing standards and the protection of ballot security, especially in light of recent debates over election integrity. Additionally, discussions around the financial implications of state appropriations for this new mailing process may lead to varied opinions.