Missouri House Bill HJR61

Missouri 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/8/23
• Refer: 5/12/23

Caption

Proposes a constitutional amendment to change the distribution of certain revenues received from the management of state natural resources

Impact

If passed, HJR61 would significantly alter the financial landscape associated with the usage of natural resources in Missouri. It implies a shift towards ensuring that local communities directly receive a share of the profits generated from natural resources, enhancing their financial capabilities to address local needs and priorities. The state legislature would have the authority to enact laws determining the specific methods and proportions for these remittances, which may vary depending on the resource and its management context.

Summary

HJR61 is a proposed joint resolution that seeks to amend Article IV of the Missouri Constitution concerning the management of state natural resources. The resolution aims to mandate that any department of the state, which receives profit from its management of natural resources, must remit a portion or all of these profits to the county where the resources are located. This provision is intended to provide a financial benefit to local governments from the exploitation of natural resources within their jurisdictions, thereby promoting local management and accountability.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HJR61 is generally positive among those who advocate for local control and financial benefits for communities impacted by resource management. Proponents argue that this bill strengthens the economic foundation of counties and allows them to invest directly in local infrastructure and services. However, there may be skepticism regarding the implementation of such a system, with concerns about ensuring equitable and transparent distribution of revenues.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the specifics of how revenues will be allocated and the potential for varied interpretations of 'profit' among different departments. Critics might voice concerns about the complexities of revenue sharing and the bureaucratic challenges it could pose. Furthermore, discussions might surface around the sustainability of resource management practices and the equitable treatment of counties that may not have equally profitable natural resources.