Missouri 2023 2023 Regular Session

Missouri Senate Bill SB3 Introduced / Fiscal Note

                    COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:0363S.01I Bill No.:SB 3  Subject:Economic Development; Department of Economic Development; Administrative 
Rules 
Type:Original  Date:January 13, 2023Bill Summary:This act establishes the Regulatory Sandbox Act. 
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026
General Revenue 
Fund* 
Unknown to Could 
exceed ($207,791)
Unknown to Could 
exceed
($242,877) 
Unknown to Could 
exceed
($247,111)
Total Estimated Net 
Effect on General 
Revenue
Unknown to Could 
exceed ($207,791)
Unknown to Could 
Exceed
($242,877) 
Unknown to Could 
Exceed
($247,111)
*Oversight notes that this proposal provides for waiving of regulations (depending upon sandbox 
participants) potentially resulting in a loss to general revenue, various state funds, and to local 
political subdivisions. Additionally, this proposal may require department FTE that could 
potentially result in an impact to the General Revenue. Lastly, the positive amount shown 
represents payment for application fees ($300) which must be paid on order to participate in the 
Sandbox program.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Various State Funds $0 or (Unknown) $0 or (Unknown)$0 or (Unknown)Total Estimated Net 
Effect on Other State 
Funds
$0 or (Unknown) $0 or (Unknown)$0 or (Unknown)
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses. L.R. No. 0363S.01I 
Bill No. SB 3  
Page 2 of 
January 13, 2023
BB:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Total Estimated Net 
Effect on All Federal 
Funds $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026General Revenue 
Fund 2 FTE 2 FTE2 FTE
Total Estimated Net 
Effect on FTE2 FTE 2 FTE2 FTE
☒ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any  
     of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☐ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
     the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Local Government $0 or (Unknown)$0 or (Unknown)$0 or (Unknown) L.R. No. 0363S.01I 
Bill No. SB 3  
Page 3 of 
January 13, 2023
BB:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Officials from the Office of Administration – Budget & Planning (B&P) note: 
An applicant shall remit to the regulatory relief office an application fee of three hundred dollars 
per application for each innovative offering. It is not specified in the bill where this money will 
be deposited, therefore B&P assumes it will be GR. This will have an unknown positive impact 
on GR and TSR.
This bill would also provide that during the demonstration period, a sandbox participant shall not 
be subject to the enforcement of state laws or regulations identified in the written agreement 
between the regulatory relief office and the sandbox participant. There is not enough information 
on what laws or regulations may be waived or what impact the waiver will have on TSR.
Oversight notes that an applicant shall remit to the regulatory relief office an application fee of 
$300 per application for each innovative offering. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a potential 
positive fiscal impact on State Funds for this application fee.
Oversight, for the purpose of this fiscal note, retrieved average patent filings in the State of 
Missouri to estimate how many entrepreneurs would potentially be participating in this pool. 
According to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office – Patent Technology Monitoring Data 
(PTMT) there were on average 868 patents filed by Missourians annually between FY 2000 to 
FY 2015. 
Oversight notes that the proposal assesses a $300 fee that must be paid in order to participate in 
this program. Oversight assumes that the fee structure could potentially result in additional 
revenue of $260,400 ($300 x 868 potential innovative entrepreneurs). Therefore, for purpose of 
this fiscal note, Oversight will reflect a positive unknown amount to the General Revenue Fund 
Oversight assumes that the fee paid to participate will be remitted to GR, for purpose of this 
fiscal note, and as shown above the amounts collected would not reach the $250,000 threshold
Officials from the Office of Administration (OA) assume this bill appears to establish the 
Regulatory relief office within the Department of Economic Development. It is assumed that the 
Office of Administration -Division of Personnel's team members would be required to provide 
assistance in establishing the new division.
The fiscal impact of this bill is determined by the total number of hours estimated (10 hours) 
multiplied by the average salary of Division of Personnel team members ($30.40) plus the added 
cost to update MoCareers, the State's centralized application platform ($300.00). Therefore, the 
total fiscal impact would be $604.00.
Officials from the Department of Revenue (DOR) note: L.R. No. 0363S.01I 
Bill No. SB 3  
Page 4 of 
January 13, 2023
BB:LR:OD
The proposal would create a new government entity, the “regulatory relief office,” which may 
enter into agreements to essentially waive the requirements of Missouri’s statutes and regulations 
on certain participating businesses. The proposal directs the regulatory relief office to consult 
with applicable agencies, including concerning whether the applicable agency has previously 
investigated, sanctions, or pursued legal action against the applicant. The proposed legislation 
prohibits these agreements from exempting an applicant “from any income, property, or sales tax 
liability unless such applicant otherwise qualifies for an exemption from such tax.”
Should a participant in this program be allowed to not pay taxes this will impact state revenue. 
DOR has numerous other tax types besides the income tax and sales tax exempted under this 
proposal. Examples include, withholding tax, tire and battery fee taxes, use taxes and more that 
do not appear protected under this proposal. Additionally, this regulatory relief office is given 
authority to waive state law and regulations. DOR is concerned this would result in filing 
deadlines being moved or changed for some filers and not others or payments being waived.
Additionally, this proposal requires the agencies to provide information on DOR’s relationships 
with a participating business to the regulatory relief office. Some of this information is currently 
protected under DOR's confidentially laws.
At this time, DOR is unable to estimate a fiscal impact from this proposal. DOR could possibly 
need additional FTE to work with the regulatory relief office depending on the number of 
participants, as well as have losses to revenue if participants are allowed to not pay taxes.
Oversight notes DOR assumes the proposal would allow for selected companies, who 
participate in the Sandbox program, to receive relief from various taxes which would have an 
effect on General Revenue and Other State Funds. Additionally, the DOR assumes the need for 
additional FTE to ensure compliance with this proposal. Oversight does not have any 
information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a potential ($0 or) unknown 
negative impact to the General Revenue and Other State Funds, as a result of reduction in a 
various tax revenues and potential FTE costs for various state agencies, in the fiscal note. 
Officials from the Department of Economic Development (DED) assume the proposal states 
that the regulatory relief office will be administered by a sandbox program director. DED has 
estimated personal service costs by taking a mid-range salary of a typical Program Director 
(Designated Principal Assistant) at DED who oversees an office but does not supervise staff. 
DED also believes additional review (e.g., reviews of state laws) would require a legal counsel 
FTE. If DED determines that additional staff are needed to administer the sandbox program, 
DED will request additional FTE through the normal budget process. 
Oversight notes that DED assumes the proposal will have a direct fiscal impact on their 
organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight 
will reflect DED’s FTE costs for Division Program Director at $80,000 and a Legal Counsel at 
$62,508 annually, in the fiscal note.   L.R. No. 0363S.01I 
Bill No. SB 3  
Page 5 of 
January 13, 2023
BB:LR:OD
Officials from the Missouri Department of Agriculture (MDA) assume the proposal, 
specifically Section 620.3905.2(4) could result in a loss of fee funds to the Missouri Department 
of Agriculture. If fees are not required to be paid in accordance with current regulations, 
guidelines, and policies, the fee-fund revenue to the Department could substantially decrease. 
The fee funds support many FTE within MDA, in accordance with their respective divisions and 
the fees associated with such; the loss of fee funds could result in the need for reductions in staff 
due to unavailability of funding. This loss in fee-fund revenue will result in a need for general 
revenue to support these necessary positions across the state of Missouri.
Oversight notes officials from the MDA assume the proposal will have a direct fiscal impact on 
their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, 
Oversight will reflect an Unknown negative impact for MDA, for various state funds, in the 
fiscal note. 
 
Officials from the Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC) assume the proposal will 
have an unknown fiscal impact on their organization. Oversight notes that the Conservation Sales 
Tax funds are derived from one-eighth of one percent sales and use tax pursuant to Article IV 
Section 43 (a) of the Missouri Constitution, thus MDC’s sales taxes are constitutional mandates. 
Additionally, Oversight notes the Park, Soil, and Water Sales Tax funds are derived from the 
one-tenth of one percent sales and use tax pursuant to Article IV Section 47 (a) thus DNR’s sales 
taxes are constitutional mandates. Therefore, Oversight will reflect the fiscal impact estimates for 
DNR’s funds. Therefore, Oversight will reflect the MDC’s and DNR’s fiscal impact estimates in 
the fiscal note. 
Officials from the Department of Commerce and Insurance (DCI) assume the proposal, 
specifically Sections 620.3900 - 620.3930, would have an unknown impact to DCI depending on 
the number of businesses and individuals that would request to participate in the Sandbox 
Program.
Oversight notes that the DCI assumes this proposal would have a direct fiscal impact on areas of 
their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, 
Oversight will reflect a negative unknown impact to various state funds in the fiscal note.  
Oversight notes that there are few examples of various agency costs in similar Sandbox 
proposals filed in the States of Utah, Ohio, Nebraska, Nevada, and the Arizona. Each fiscal note 
addresses the difficulty of projecting any costs associated with the proposals. However, a recent 
fiscal note submitted to the Nebraska Legislature for consideration of similar bill LB 1127 
(Nebraska Sandbox proposal - 2022) from various agencies claiming costs associated with the 
proposal, are provided in the Table 1. 
Oversight notes that the Missouri Sandbox proposal requires, among other duties, the 
Administrator to: 
 L.R. No. 0363S.01I 
Bill No. SB 3  
Page 6 of 
January 13, 2023
BB:LR:OD




being of consumers


agencies and other states


Oversight notes that there are many other duties required from the Sandbox Office under this 
proposal. Therefore, it is probable that the agencies tasked with the regulatory implementation of 
this program, such as DOR or DED, will need additional FTEs in order to provide the regulatory 
framework and compliance procedures for this Act. 
Oversight notes that Missouri population is at least 3 times greater (6.6M – Missouri population 
/ 1.94M –Nebraska Population) than that of Nebraska, thus the costs could potentially reach a 
higher level of expenditure in Missouri. Therefore, for purpose of this fiscal note, Oversight will 
note an unknown negative impact to the General Revenue and Other State Funds, which could 
potentially exceed $250,000 in various FTE and forgone tax revenue costs to various state funds 
in the fiscal note.
Table 1.
A
GENCY 
F
Y 2023
F
Y 2024
D
epartment of Economic Development 
5
20,380.00
$
                        
6
41,930.00
$
                        
D
epartment of Banking and Finance 
2
23,025.00
$
                        
2
15,325.00
$
                        
B
oard of Engineers and Architects 
3
,300.00
$
                            
3
,300.00
$
                            
D
epartment of Environment and Energy 
2
02,371.00
$
                        
2
02,371.00
$
                        
D
epartment of Agriculture 
7
7,500.00
$
                          
7
7,500.00
$
                          
L
iquor Control Commission NFI NFI
N
o Fiscal Impact
N
o Fiscal Impact
M
otor Vehicle Industry Licensing Board No discernable impact No discernable impact
N
o Discernable impact
N
o Discernable impact
N
ebraska State Electrical Division Indeterminable Indeterminable
I
ndeterminable
I
ndeterminable
B
oard of Barber Examiners Indeterminable Indeterminable
I
ndeterminable
I
ndeterminable
A
ttorney General NFI NFI
N
o Fiscal Impact
N
o Fiscal Impact
N
ebraska Real Estate Commission Negligible to significant Negligible to significant
N
egligible to Significant
N
egligible to Significant
S
upreme Court NFI NFI
N
o Fiscal Impact
N
o Fiscal Impact
D
epartment of Labor NFI NFI
N
o Fiscal Impact
N
o Fiscal Impact
D
epartment of Administrative Services 
7
1,200.00
$
                          
7
7,000.00
$
                          
D
epartment of Insurance 
1
68,900.00
$
                        
1
73,317.00
$
                        
T
otal 
1
,127,776.00
$
                    
1
,217,426.00
$
                    
F
TE total
9
.5
1
0.5 L.R. No. 0363S.01I 
Bill No. SB 3  
Page 7 of 
January 13, 2023
BB:LR:OD
In response to the similar version of the proposal, HB 2587 – 2022, officials from the Office of 
the Governor (GOV) assume the proposal adds to the governor’s current load of appointment 
duties. Individually, additional requirements should not fiscally impact the Office of the 
Governor. However, the cumulative impact of additional appointment duties across all enacted 
legislation may require additional resources for the Office of the Governor.
Oversight assumes GOV is provided with core funding to handle a certain amount of activity 
each year. Oversight assumes GOV could absorb the costs related to this proposal. If multiple 
bills pass which require additional staffing and duties at substantial costs, GOV could request 
funding through the appropriation process.
In response to the similar proposal, HB 268 – 2023, officials from the Missouri State Senate 
assume the proposal will have a negative fiscal impact to the senate contingent appropriation to 
reimburse 2 senators for travel to meetings of the General Regulatory Sandbox Program 
Advisory Committee. Details are in the attached analysis. In summary, it will cost approximately 
$281.60 per meeting. 
Oversight notes the Missouri State Senate assumes no fiscal responsibility for the other 
committee members.
Oversight notes that Missouri State Senate assume the proposal will have a direct fiscal impact 
on their organization. Oversight assumes the impact to the SEN will not be material and 
therefore, will no reflect a negative fiscal impact in the fiscal note.  
 
Officials from the Office of Administration – Administrative Hearing Commission, the  
Missouri Department of Transportation, the Department of Natural Resources, and the 
Department of Labor and Industrial Relations each assume the proposal will have no fiscal 
impact on their respective organizations. Oversight does not have any information to the 
contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these agencies. 
Officials from the City of Kansas City, the City of O’Fallon, and the City of Springfield each 
assume this proposal would not have a direct fiscal impact on their respective organizations. 
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a 
zero impact in the fiscal note for these local political subdivisions.  
Oversight notes each county and city assess sales or use tax on the sale of goods in Missouri. 
The tax remitted to various local political subdivisions serves the local political subdivision 
needs. DOR assume the companies could receive relief from various taxes. This could have an 
effect on the local political subdivisions. Therefore, Oversight will note a potential unknown 
negative impact to the local political subdivision funds in the fiscal note, depending upon 
sandbox participants and applications.   L.R. No. 0363S.01I 
Bill No. SB 3  
Page 8 of 
January 13, 2023
BB:LR:OD
Officials from the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules assume this proposal is not 
anticipated to cause a fiscal impact beyond its current appropriation.
 
Officials from the Office of the Secretary of State (SOS) note many bills considered by the 
General Assembly include provisions allowing or requiring agencies to submit rules and 
regulations to implement the act. The SOS is provided with core funding to handle a certain 
amount of normal activity resulting from each year's legislative session. The fiscal impact for 
this fiscal note to the SOS for Administrative Rules is less than $5,000. The SOS recognizes that 
this is a small amount and does not expect that additional funding would be required to meet 
these costs. However, the SOS also recognizes that many such bills may be passed by the 
General Assembly in a given year and that collectively the costs may be in excess of what the 
office can sustain with its core budget. Therefore, the SOS reserves the right to request funding 
for the cost of supporting administrative rules requirements should the need arise based on a 
review of the finally approved bills signed by the governor.
FISCAL IMPACT – State GovernmentFY 2024
(10 Mo.)
FY 2025FY 2026GENERAL REVENUE FUNDRevenue Gain – $300 Fee Paid to 
participate in the program (p.3) 
§620.3915.2
$0 or
Unknown
$0 or
Unknown
$0 or
Unknown
Cost – Reduction in Revenues – various 
tax not paid (p.4)
$0 or
(Unknown)
$0 or
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
Cost – DOR– FTE necessary to comply 
with the proposal (p.5)
$0 or
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or
(Unknown)
Costs – DED 2 FTE – Section 620.3905   Personnel Service($118,757)($145,358)($148,265)  Fringe Benefits($70,404)($85,550)($86,638)  Expense & Equipment($18,630)($11,969)($12,208)Total Costs - ($207,791)($242,877)($247,111)FTE Change2 FTE2 FTE2 FTE
NET EFFECT ON THE GENERAL 
REVENUE FUND
Unknown to 
Could exceed 
($207,791)
Unknown to 
Could Exceed
($242,877) 
Unknown to 
Could Exceed
($247,111) L.R. No. 0363S.01I 
Bill No. SB 3  
Page 9 of 
January 13, 2023
BB:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – State Government 
(continued)
FY 2024
(10 Mo.)
FY 2025FY 2026OTHER STATE FUNDS Loss of Revenues - to various State 
Funds – various tax or fees not paid 
OA, DNR, MDC, DCI, MDA (p.5)
$0 or
(Unknown)
$0 or
(Unknown)
$0 or
(Unknown)
NET EFFECT ON THE OTHER 
STATE FUNDS
$0 or
 (Unknown)
$0 or
 (Unknown)
$0 or  
(Unknown)
FISCAL IMPACT – Local GovernmentFY 2024
(10 Mo.)
FY 2025FY 2026LOCAL POLITICAL 
SUBDIVISIONS
Loss of Revenues - to various local 
funds –various tax not paid (p.7)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or  
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
NET EFFECT ON THE LOCAL 
POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
Small businesses, who will participate in the Sandbox program, will be able to receive potential 
tax reductions resulting in revenue gains. 
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
This act establishes the "Regulatory Sandbox Act", which creates the Regulatory Relief Office 
within the Department of Economic Development. The Regulatory Relief Office shall administer 
the provisions of the act with the purpose of identifying state laws or regulations that could 
potentially be waived or suspended for participating businesses during a two-year period in 
which the participating business demonstrates an innovative product offering to consumers.
The Regulatory Relief Office shall maintain a web page on the Department's website that invites 
residents and businesses to make suggestions regarding laws and regulations that could be 
modified or eliminated to reduce the regulatory burden of residents and businesses in the state. 
(Section 620.3905)
The Regulatory Relief Office shall be responsible for evaluating and approving or denying 
applications to participate in the Sandbox Program. An applicant shall submit an application 
along with a $300 application fee to the Regulatory Relief Office, which shall include contact  L.R. No. 0363S.01I 
Bill No. SB 3  
Page 10 of 12
January 13, 2023
BB:LR:OD
information and a description of the innovative offering to be demonstrated, including statements 
regarding how the innovative offering is subject to licensing, legal prohibition, or other 
authorization requirements outside of the Sandbox Program; each law or regulation that the 
applicant seeks to have waived or suspended while participating in the Sandbox Program; how 
the innovative offering would benefit consumers; and what risks might exist for consumers who 
use or purchase the innovative offering, as described in the act.
No later than fifteen business days after the day on which a completed application is received by 
the Regulatory Relief Office, the Office shall review the application and refer the application to 
each applicable agency, as defined in the act, which regulates the applicant's business. No later 
than forty-five days after the day on which an applicable agency receives a completed 
application for review, the applicable agency shall provide a written report to the Sandbox 
Program director with the applicable agency's findings, including any identifiable, likely, and 
significant harm to the health, safety, or financial well-being of consumers that the relevant law 
or regulation protects against, and a recommendation to the Regulatory Relief Office that the 
applicant either be admitted or denied entrance into the Sandbox Program. An applicable agency 
may deny an application for reasons described in the act. The Regulatory Relief Office shall not 
approve any application denied by an applicable agency. (Section 620.3915)
Upon the receipt of a report from all applicable agencies, the Regulatory Relief Office shall 
provide the application and associated reports to the General Regulatory Sandbox Program 
Advisory Committee, which is created by the act. The Advisory Committee shall be composed of 
eleven members, as described in the act. The Advisory Committee shall advise and make 
recommendations to the Regulatory Relief Office on whether to approve applications to the 
Sandbox Program, and may meet at its own discretion to override a decision of the Regulatory 
Relief Office on the admission or denial of an applicant to the Sandbox Program, provided such 
override is decided with a two-thirds majority vote of the members of the Advisory Committee, 
and further provided that such vote shall be taken within fifteen business days of the Regulatory 
Relief Office's decision. Meetings of the Advisory Committee shall not be considered public 
meetings for the purposes of the Sunshine Law. (Section 620.3910)
Upon approval of an application, a sandbox participant shall have twenty-four months after the 
day on which its application was approved to demonstrate the innovative offering described in 
the sandbox participant's application. During such period, the sandbox participant shall be 
exempt from the laws and regulations outlined in an agreement entered into with the Regulatory 
Relief Office. Innovative offerings shall only be available to consumers who are residents of this 
state, and no law or regulation shall be waived or suspended if such waiver or suspension would 
prevent a consumer from seeking restitution in the event that the consumer is harmed. A sandbox 
participant shall not be subject to prosecution or administrative penalty for a violation of any law 
or regulation that is waived or suspended during the duration of the participant's demonstration 
period. (Section 620.3920)
Prior to demonstrating an innovative offering, a sandbox participant shall disclose certain 
information to consumers, as described in the act. (Section 620.3925) L.R. No. 0363S.01I 
Bill No. SB 3  
Page 11 of 12
January 13, 2023
BB:LR:OD
At least forty-five days prior to the end of a participant's demonstration period, the participant 
shall notify the Regulatory Relief Office that it either intends to exit the Sandbox Program or that 
it seeks an extension. The Regulatory Relief Office may grant an extension not to exceed twelve 
months, and a participant may seek multiple extensions. If a demonstration includes an 
innovative offering that requires ongoing services or duties beyond the two-year demonstration 
period, the participant may continue to demonstrate the offering, but shall be subject to all laws 
and regulations that were waived or suspended as part of the Sandbox Program.
A sandbox participant shall retain certain records for a period of two years after exiting the 
Sandbox Program.
The Regulatory Relief Office shall establish quarterly reporting requirements for each 
participant, and each participant shall notify the Regulatory Relief Office and each applicable 
agency of any incidents that result in harm to the health, safety, or financial well-being of a 
consumer.
No later than forty-five days after a sandbox participant exits the Sandbox Program, such 
participant shall submit a written report describing an overview of the demonstration. No later 
than thirty days after receiving such report, an applicable agency shall provide a written report to 
the Regulatory Relief Office that describes any statutory or regulatory reform the applicable 
agency recommends. (Section 620.3930)
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not 
require additional capital improvements or rental space. L.R. No. 0363S.01I 
Bill No. SB 3  
Page 12 of 12
January 13, 2023
BB:LR:OD
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Office of Administration – Budget & Planning
Office of Administration – Administrative Hearing Commission
Office of Administration
Department of Economic Development
Missouri Department of Conservation
Department of Natural Resources
Department of Revenue
Missouri Department of Transportation
Joint Committee on Administrative Rules
Office of the Secretary of State
Missouri Senate
City of Kansas City
City of Springfield 
Julie MorffRoss StropeDirectorAssistant DirectorJanuary 13, 2023January 13, 2023