Modifies the administrative rulemaking process for those proposed rules with fiscal notes in excess of $250,000
The primary impact of SB 331 is an increased requirement for legislative review of administrative rules that carry substantial fiscal implications. By necessitating approval from the general assembly for rules with fiscal notes over the specified amount, the bill strengthens legislative control and may lead to a more cautious approach to new regulations. This change could potentially slow down the implementation of certain rules, particularly those initiated by state agencies, resulting in an enduring effect on the efficiency of the regulatory process.
Senate Bill 331 aims to modify the administrative rulemaking process in Missouri, particularly for rules that have fiscal implications exceeding $250,000. The bill stipulates that any proposed rule meeting this cost threshold must be ratified by the general assembly before it can take effect. This change is intended to enhance legislative oversight over rulemaking, ensuring that significant financial implications are carefully evaluated and approved by elected representatives rather than being enacted solely by administrative agencies.
The sentiment surrounding SB 331 appears to lean towards supporting legislative accountability and oversight in state rulemaking processes. Proponents argue that bringing fiscal implications into the legislative purview promotes transparency and ensures that financial impacts are adequately considered by elected officials. Conversely, critics may raise concerns about the potential bureaucratic delays that could arise from requiring such oversight, potentially hindering timely regulatory responses to emerging needs.
Notable points of contention include the balance between efficient governance and comprehensive oversight. Advocates for the bill contend that increased legislative review serves the public interest by preventing costly regulations from being enacted without sufficient scrutiny. However, opponents may argue that adding layers of legislative approval could inhibit state agencies' abilities to act swiftly in response to necessary regulatory changes, ultimately affecting the delivery of services and initiatives that rely on adaptive regulatory frameworks.