Missouri 2023 Regular Session

Missouri Senate Bill SB386

Introduced
1/4/23  

Caption

Establishes disclosure procedures for a claimant in an action for damages due to asbestos exposure

Impact

The enactment of SB 386 will impact Missouri state laws concerning asbestos exposure cases by establishing stricter requirements for claimants. This includes the stipulation that a claimant must file a sworn information form detailing their exposure and any asbestos trust claims they may be eligible for within a specific timeframe after filing a lawsuit. Additionally, defendants may be able to obtain credits against any judgment if payments are made by asbestos trusts, which could ultimately influence how these claims are litigated and settled in state courts.

Summary

Senate Bill 386 introduces new procedures for actions related to damages resulting from asbestos exposure, specifically focusing on the requirements and disclosures necessary for claimants filing such claims. The bill mandates that claimants provide detailed sworn information about their exposure and any related claims against asbestos trusts, essentially streamlining the process of handling asbestos-related lawsuits. The measures are intended to ensure that necessary documentation is supplied early in the litigation process to facilitate a more efficient resolution of claims.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB 386 appears to be mixed. Supporters of the bill argue that it will help streamline asbestos litigation and reduce the backlog of cases. They believe that the increased disclosure requirements will lead to more transparency and quicker resolutions. Conversely, opponents worry that the new disclosure requirements could complicate the claims process for victims and may potentially limit their access to compensation by placing additional burdens on claimants.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the concerns raised regarding the fairness of the new requirements. Critics argue that while the bill aims to provide clarity and efficiency in the courtroom, it may inadvertently create hurdles for claimants, especially those who are already dealing with serious health issues related to asbestos exposure. Additionally, questions have been raised about how these changes will affect the balance of power between claimants and defendants, particularly regarding the rights of individuals seeking justice for asbestos-related injuries.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MO SB879

Establishes disclosure procedures for a claimant in an action for damages due to asbestos exposure

TX SB1202

Relating to asbestos and silica litigation.

TX HB2034

Relating to asbestos and silica litigation.

UT HB0539

Veteran Property Tax Exemption

LA HB302

Provides relative to transparency in asbestos actions

CT SB00123

An Act Concerning Coerced Debt.

MI SB0329

Insurance: insurers; processing of a claim; modify duties. Amends 1956 PA 218 (MCL 500.100 - 500.8302) by adding ch. 30B.

MI HB4681

Insurance: insurers; processing of a claim; modify duties. Amends 1956 PA 218 (MCL 500.100 - 500.8302) by adding ch. 30B.