Authorizes the statutorily required independent audit of the State Auditor
Impact
The resolution is significant because it reinforces the accountability of the State Auditor's office, ensuring that its operations and financial transactions are subject to external scrutiny. This move aims to enhance public trust in governmental operations and promotes transparency within the state's financial management processes. It also demonstrates the commitment of the Missouri General Assembly to uphold accountability standards within state agencies.
Summary
SCR10 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution that mandates an independent audit of the State Auditor's office, as required by Section 29.351 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri. The resolution authorizes the employment of an independent certified public accountant or accounting firm to conduct this audit during the regular legislative session in an odd-numbered year. The audit will evaluate the accounts, functions, programs, and management of the State Auditor's office according to generally accepted auditing standards.
Sentiment
The sentiment around SCR10 has been overwhelmingly positive, with broad support from members of the General Assembly. The unanimous vote in favor highlights a collective agreement on the importance of oversight and the role of independent audits in maintaining governmental integrity. Lawmakers appear to view this resolution as a necessary step in assuring the public that state funds are being managed competently and ethically.
Contention
While there seems to be general support for this resolution, some may raise questions regarding the costs associated with executing the audit and the potential disruptions it could cause within the State Auditor's office. However, the resolution addresses these concerns by specifying that the costs will be covered by the joint contingent fund of the General Assembly, thereby diminishing worries about financial implications for the office. Overall, the proposal is positioned as a fundamental measure for improving governmental oversight rather than a point of contention.