Missouri 2023 Regular Session

Missouri Senate Bill SJR3

Introduced
1/4/23  
Refer
1/12/23  
Refer
2/7/23  
Engrossed
2/9/23  
Refer
4/3/23  
Report Pass
4/13/23  
Refer
4/17/23  
Report Pass
4/20/23  

Caption

Modifies provisions relating to taxation

Impact

If passed, SJR3 would have significant implications for tax policy in Missouri. It would formally set the maximum state income tax rate at 5.5%, which could lead to more predictable tax revenues for the state. Additionally, the restrictions on expanding sales and use taxes would protect many local businesses from new competition, particularly in the service sector. This measure reflects a push towards limiting governmental control over personal income and promoting an economically friendly environment.

Summary

SJR3, introduced by Senator Koenig, is a joint resolution proposing amendments to Missouri's Constitution regarding taxation. The bill seeks to repeal certain sections of Article X and adopt new provisions that set a cap on state income tax rates and limit the ability of the general assembly to impose new sales and use taxes on services that were not taxed as of January 1, 2015. This amendment aims to prevent an increase in the tax burden on Missouri citizens, establishing a sense of fiscal conservatism to attract business and investment in the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SJR3 appears to be largely supportive among pro-business lawmakers and fiscal conservatives, who view the amendment as a necessary step to ensure economic stability. Supporters argue that by capping tax rates, Missouri will be more competitive with surrounding states. However, concerns were raised by opponents who argue that limiting tax options could hinder the state’s ability to respond to fiscal needs in the future and may disproportionately affect services in local areas.

Contention

Notable points of contention in the discussions around SJR3 focused on the potential long-term consequences of restricting tax increases. Critics pointed out the risks of underfunding essential services that rely on tax revenue, such as education and infrastructure. The debate highlighted the balance between maintaining a taxpayer-friendly environment and ensuring sufficient funding for state mandates and local services, suggesting ongoing discussions and possible revisions may be needed before final adoption.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.