Prohibits the division of geology and land survey of the department of natural resources from disclosing to the public any individually identifiable user information contained within water user registration documents
The impact of HB 2669 on state laws is primarily seen in its attempt to streamline the process of water management while ensuring the confidentiality of major water users' data. By mandating the registration of water withdrawals, the state aims to create a clearer picture of water usage across various sectors, potentially influencing future water resource management strategies. This shift could lead to better regulation and oversight of water resources, particularly in areas facing water scarcity or regulatory scrutiny.
House Bill 2669 aims to amend existing regulations regarding the withdrawal and diversion of water by major users in Missouri. The bill seeks to require these users to file official registration documents with the Division of Geology and Land Survey, outlining important details such as the name and location of the water source, type of source, and the amount of water being withdrawn. A significant aspect is the bill's emphasis on confidentiality; it prohibits the division from disclosing any individually identifiable user information contained within these registration documents, thereby protecting sensitive data from public access.
The sentiment surrounding HB 2669 reflects a concern for both the need for water regulation and the importance of privacy among water users. Supporters of the bill recognize the necessity of tracking water use to manage resources better but are equally committed to protecting individual user information from public scrutiny. The bill has garnered support from those who prioritize responsible water management practices while balancing the interests of local businesses relying on water resources.
Notable points of contention center around the balance between regulatory oversight and individual privacy rights. Critics may argue that although the bill provides necessary regulation, there could be potential issues regarding the effectiveness and enforcement of such registration systems. Additionally, the limitations on public access to this data might hinder efforts aimed at transparency and community engagement in water management debates, particularly in local areas where water sources are under significant stress.