Missouri 2024 Regular Session

Missouri House Bill HB2719

Introduced
2/19/24  
Refer
2/22/24  
Report Pass
3/6/24  
Refer
3/6/24  
Report Pass
3/13/24  
Refer
3/27/24  
Report Pass
3/28/24  
Engrossed
4/10/24  

Caption

Modifies provisions for the division of tourism supplemental revenue fund

Impact

By modifying how the funding for the Division of Tourism is structured, HB2719 aims to reinforce the state’s commitment to bolster tourism as a significant aspect of economic activity. The implications suggest that there will be a clearer pathway for the allocation of financial resources aimed at enhancing tourism services. This reallocation is expected to create stronger promotional strategies and marketing initiatives that target diverse markets, significantly impacting businesses that depend on tourism.

Summary

House Bill 2719 modifies the structure of the Division of Tourism Supplemental Revenue Fund in Missouri. The bill enacts provisions to establish a designated fund composed of appropriated money, gifts, and contributions for the division of tourism. One primary objective of the bill is to ensure that the funds exclusively serve the tourism sector and are made available to promote activities related to tourism and economic development. This is aimed at enhancing the state's tourism-related initiatives that contribute positively to the economy.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around HB2719 is positive among those who manage and advocate for tourism-related businesses. Supporters believe that a more dedicated financial structure will lead to increased investments in tourism, enhancing the state’s appeal to visitors. However, the sentiment is less favorable among those who are cautious about the reliance on sales tax revenue generated from tourism, voicing concerns about fluctuations in tourist traffic that could affect the fund's adequacy.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill revolve around the sustainability of tourism revenue and its potential dependency on economic conditions. Critics of the bill worry that focusing funds solely on tourism might overlook other equally important areas that require state attention and support. There is also concern about managing public expectations regarding the outcomes of increased tourism funding and whether it will translate into meaningful economic benefits across the state.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.