Proposes a constitutional amendment relating to firearms
The proposed amendment has implications for the state's legal framework regarding firearms. It aims to align state regulations more closely with the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution and Supreme Court decisions, allowing local jurisdictions such as counties and cities to enact ordinances regulating the possession and transfer of firearms within their borders. These regulations may include provisions for issuing permits, conducting background checks, and setting penalties for violations, thus creating a more structured approach to dealing with firearms in urban areas while respecting Constitutionally guaranteed rights.
House Joint Resolution No. 164, introduced by Representative Baringer, proposes a significant amendment to the Constitution of Missouri, specifically targeting Section 23 of Article I, which pertains to firearms. This resolution seeks to repeal the existing section and adopt a new one that enshrines the rights of citizens to keep and bear arms while introducing specific regulatory measures. Notably, the new section emphasizes that the right to possess firearms and related accessories is unalienable and shields it from restrictive scrutiny. Furthermore, the amendment obligates the state to uphold these rights against infringement, establishing a clear and robust defense for gun ownership in Missouri.
There are notable points of contention surrounding HJR164, particularly regarding the extent of local governance over firearm regulations. Critics argue that repealing the current section could dilute the power of local governments to address specific safety concerns within their communities. Additionally, there are fears that overly permissive regulations could lead to an increase in gun violence, while supporters of the bill contend that the revised amendment will strengthen individual rights and ensure that gun ownership is protected against potential overreach by the state or local authorities. This debate encapsulates broader national discussions about gun rights versus regulations, reflecting the polarized opinions on the issue.