Proposes a constitutional amendment relating to firearms
The amendment also allows for local governments such as counties and cities to regulate the possession and carrying of firearms within their limits, but only in accordance with state law and federal regulations. This means that while local authorities can impose regulations, those regulations cannot infringe on the fundamental rights guaranteed by the amendment. Consequently, jurisdictions could establish permit systems to manage firearm carrying, provided that such systems are fairly implemented and not overly restrictive.
HJR172 is a proposed constitutional amendment that seeks to repeal Section 23 of Article I of the Missouri Constitution and replace it with new language that reinforces the right of citizens to keep and bear arms. The amendment explicitly states that the right to possess firearms, ammunition, and related accessories for self-defense and the protection of one's home, family, and property shall not be questioned. It establishes that any restrictions on these rights will be subject to 'strict scrutiny,' placing a strong legal standard on any potential regulations.
Ultimately, HJR172 represents a momentous shift in Missouri's approach to gun rights, directly responding to national conversations on Second Amendment protections. The outcome of this amendment could set a precedent for how Missouri's constitution addresses the interplay between individual rights and local regulations concerning firearms, making it a pivotal topic in the upcoming elections.
Notably, HJR172 highlights a crucial debate over gun rights and local governance. Supporters argue that the amendment would strengthen individual rights and ensure clarity in firearm ownership laws, while opponents may express concerns regarding the potential for leniency in enforcement and the implications for public safety. The measure is likely to attract significant attention as it approaches the ballot, especially considering its provisions related to penalties for violations of local ordinances. Some may fear that said penalties, which can include fines and jail time, might be excessive or misapplied.