Proposes an amendment to the Constitution of Missouri to require Jackson County to have an elected county assessor instead of an unelected assessment department
If passed, HJR68 would significantly alter the governance structure of Jackson County, making the county assessor an elected position subject to the will of the electorate. This could potentially lead to greater public engagement in county affairs and allow for more responsive governance. Elected assessors may be more inclined to consider the interests and concerns of their constituents compared to appointed officials, who may not have the same level of accountability to the public. Additionally, this change could influence how county assessments are conducted and the priorities set within the assessor's office.
HJR68 proposes an amendment to the Constitution of Missouri that would mandate the election of the county assessor in Jackson County, replacing the current system where the assessor is appointed and serves under an unelected assessment department. This proposed change seeks to enhance democratic accountability and local control by ensuring that the citizens have the power to elect this key official, rather than leaving this power in the hands of an appointed department. The bill outlines that the amendment will be presented to voters during the general election scheduled for November 2024 or at a special election called by the governor.
The sentiment surrounding HJR68 appears largely positive among proponents of local governance and democratic accountability. Supporters argue that the amendment addresses the need for transparency and oversight in local government functions, especially in relation to property assessments which can significantly impact taxpayers. Conversely, there may be some concerns or opposition regarding the potential politicization of the assessor's office and how this could affect the impartiality of property valuation, particularly in a diverse and populous county like Jackson.
One notable point of contention involves the balance between local governance and the potential complications of elected officials managing what some may view as technical or administrative duties. Opponents might argue that the complexity of the assessment process necessitates expert knowledge which could be compromised by electoral pressures. Proponents counter that having an elected official would hold the assessor accountable to the voters, thus incentivizing transparency and fairness in property assessments. The debate over HJR68 encapsulates broader discussions about the effectiveness and accountability of government structures at the local level.