Prohibits state agencies from collecting fees or penalties until all administrative remedies have been exhausted
Impact
The impact of SB848 is expected to be significant in the realm of administrative law and the relationship between state agencies and individuals. By mandating the exhaustion of administrative remedies prior to any collection activities, the bill seeks to promote fairness and transparency in the processes governing the collection of debts owed to the state. This legislation could potentially alleviate pressure from individuals facing penalties or fees, thereby fostering a more equitable system for resolving disputes with state agencies.
Summary
Senate Bill 848 introduced by Senator Hough aims to amend existing legislation by prohibiting state agencies from initiating any action for the garnishment or collection of administrative penalties, fees, or alleged overpayments and underpayments until all administrative remedies provided under the law have been fully exhausted. The intent behind this bill is to ensure that individuals have the opportunity to contest any penalties or fees owed to state agencies without the immediate threat of collection actions, which could lead to financial hardships.
Contention
While the bill appears to be aimed at protecting individuals, there may be concerns regarding its implications for state revenue collection. Proponents argue that it provides necessary safeguards for individuals against potentially aggressive collection tactics by state agencies. Conversely, critics may argue that delaying collection processes could hinder state agencies' ability to function effectively and manage their budgets, as they rely on timely collections of owed fees and penalties. Thus, the bill may spark debate regarding the balance between individual rights and fiscal responsibility of the state.