Missouri Senate Bill SB972

Missouri 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/3/24
• Refer: 1/25/24

Caption

Modifies provisions relating to child custody

Impact

The proposed changes in SB 972 would have a profound impact on how custody and support cases are handled in Missouri. By establishing a rebuttable presumption that certain guidelines should be followed for determining child support, the legislation aims to ensure consistency in outcomes across similar cases. Furthermore, the bill expands the considerations for custody awards and introduces a more structured process for handling proposed relocations of children, enhancing protections for parents seeking to change the principal residence of their children.

Summary

Senate Bill 972 aims to reform child custody and support laws in Missouri by repealing and replacing several existing statutory provisions regarding custody arrangements and their legal implications. The bill emphasizes joint custody arrangements, recognizing the benefits of maintaining significant contact between children and both parents after separation or divorce. It sets forth new guidelines for determining child support obligations, including factors that courts must consider in awarding support, such as the child's needs, parents' financial resources, and specific visitation arrangements. The new framework seeks to create a more standardized process for family courts in these matters.

Contention

Despite its positive intentions, SB 972 has raised some points of contention among legislators and stakeholders. Critics express concerns about how the proposed changes might affect parents who may not have the resources to navigate the legal complexities that arise from the new guidelines. There are also concerns that the emphasis on joint custody may in some cases overlook the safety and well-being of children, especially in situations involving domestic violence. The requirement for parents to adhere to strict notification rules if relocating adds another layer of complexity to custody disputes, which some argue could be burdensome in cases with less amicable separations.