The implications of SB981 are significant as it clarifies and potentially expands the scope of what constitutes state-controlled waters. By modifying definitions, the bill could alter enforcement mechanisms related to water quality and contamination standards. It impacts both existing regulations and the approach taken by the Department of Natural Resources concerning clean-ups and emergency responses pertaining to hazardous substances. The enforcement will entail added responsibilities for various entities handling hazardous substances, ensuring compliance with updated definitions and standards.
Summary
Senate Bill 981 aims to modify the existing legal definitions surrounding the 'waters of the state' within Missouri. This bill seeks to repeal and replace sections 260.500 and 644.016 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri, introducing new terminology and regulations related to hazardous substances and their management. The changes are part of a broader effort to more clearly delineate state jurisdiction over water sources and the conditions associated with hazardous substance releases.
Contention
Notable points of contention surrounding SB981 include concerns regarding the potential regulatory burden on businesses and local governments. Some stakeholders fear the new definitions may lead to stricter liability and higher compliance costs, which could disproportionately impact smaller entities. Additionally, environmental advocacy groups may argue that the bill could dilute protections under existing laws by creating ambiguities about the classification and management of hazardous materials. As the bill proceeds through the legislative process, these concerns are likely to be debated extensively.
An Act Delaying Implementation Of Certain Standards And Sampling Requirements Upon The Detection Of Pollutants Causing Contamination Of Soil, Groundwater Or Public Or Private Drinking Water Wells.
Requires DEP to study feasibility of using alternative water supply source when perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances exceed maximum contaminant level.
Requires DEP to study feasibility of using alternative water supply source when perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances exceed maximum contaminant level.
Requires certain water purveyors to identify, and use, alternative water supply source when perfluoralkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances exceed maximum contaminant levels.