Expresses the concern of the General Assembly regarding policies of international organizations that advocate for policies that could undermine the core values and interests of Missouri's residents
SCR37 highlights a number of specific issues of concern, including the promotion of insect-based foods, increased regulatory burdens on farmers under the guise of sustainability, and the establishment of social credit systems that could infringe on personal freedoms. The resolution suggests that these proposals could pose a significant risk to economic freedom and individual autonomy by imposing limitations on food choices, personal behavior, and privacy. This stance indicates a broader ambition to reevaluate and critique the state's interactions with international entities, encouraging thorough scrutiny of any agreements made with them.
Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 37 (SCR37) addresses concerns regarding the influence of international organizations such as the World Health Organization, the United Nations, and the World Economic Forum on the citizens of Missouri. The resolution articulates a strong commitment to the principles of sovereignty and independence, denouncing various proposals by these organizations that allegedly threaten the core values and interests of Missouri's residents. The resolution serves as a formal expression of the General Assembly's opposition to policies perceived to undermine Missouri's autonomy and individual liberties.
Key points of contention within SCR37 revolve around its criticism of environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) requirements placed on businesses, which opponents argue may negatively impact economic growth and entrepreneurial freedom. This resolution reflects a growing sentiment among certain legislative factions that prioritize local control and resistance against perceived overreach by external authorities. Moreover, by positioning itself against global medical mandates and digital identification systems, the resolution echoes widespread concerns regarding personal data privacy and government oversight, fostering a dialogue around the balance between public health initiatives and individual rights.