Modifies term limits for members of the General Assembly
If enacted, SJR69 would alter the way term limits are structured for Missouri legislators, potentially allowing more seasoned politicians to remain in office longer. Proponents argue that extended term limits could lead to greater experience and stability within the legislature, resulting in more knowledgeable decision-making. This could foster a sense of continuity and increase the capacity for long-term planning on critical issues facing the state.
SJR69, introduced by Senator Mosley, is a proposed amendment to the Missouri Constitution that seeks to modify the term limits for members of the General Assembly. Specifically, the bill aims to repeal the current limitations and replace them with new provisions, allowing individuals to serve up to twelve years in one house and a total of twenty-four years across both houses. This change represents a significant increase from the previous limits of eight years for one house and sixteen years for both, which has been a topic of contention among lawmakers and voters alike.
Despite these perceived benefits, the bill has faced opposition from various groups concerned about the implications of longer tenures in office. Critics assert that extended term limits might further entrench incumbency, reduce electoral competitiveness, and diminish accountability among legislators. They argue that shorter terms encourage fresh perspectives and prevent the stagnation of ideas within the General Assembly. The upcoming election, with the proposal on the ballot, will likely spark vigorous debate about the merits and drawbacks of changing these foundational governance rules.