Old | New | Differences | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | FIRSTREGULARSESSION | |
2 | 2 | HOUSEBILLNO.1326 | |
3 | 3 | 103RDGENERALASSEMBLY | |
4 | 4 | INTRODUCEDBYREPRESENTATIVEFOGLE. | |
5 | 5 | 1453H.01I JOSEPHENGLER,ChiefClerk | |
6 | 6 | ANACT | |
7 | 7 | Toamendchapter431,RSMo,byaddingtheretoonenewsectionrelatingtocovenantsnotto | |
8 | 8 | compete. | |
9 | 9 | BeitenactedbytheGeneralAssemblyofthestateofMissouri,asfollows: | |
10 | 10 | SectionA.Chapter431,RSMo,isamendedbyaddingtheretoonenewsection,tobe | |
11 | 11 | 2knownassection431.203,toreadasfollows: | |
12 | 12 | 431.203.1.Forpurposesofthissection,"covenantnottocompete"meansan | |
13 | 13 | 2agreement,understanding,contract,orcontractualterminwhichanemployeeor | |
14 | 14 | 3prospectiveemployeeagreesnottocompeteagainstanemployerorprospective | |
15 | 15 | 4employeroragreesnottoacceptanypositionswithacompetitorofanemployeror | |
16 | 16 | 5prospectiveemployerfollowingtheterminationofabusinessoremployment | |
17 | 17 | 6relationshipbetweentheemployeeorprospectiveemployeeandtheemployeror | |
18 | 18 | 7prospectiveemployer.Acovenantnottocompetemay,butneednot,containtime-based | |
19 | 19 | 8orgeographiclimitations. | |
20 | 20 | 9 2.Notwithstandinganyprovisionofsection431.202oranyotherprovisionof | |
21 | 21 | 10lawtothecontrary,acovenantnottocompeteshallbevoidandunenforceabletothe | |
22 | 22 | 11extentthatitappliestoanemploymentarrangementwhereinanemployeeisorwould | |
23 | 23 | 12bepaidhourlywages. | |
24 | 24 | âś” | |
25 | 25 | EXPLANATION—Matterenclosedinbold-facedbrackets[thus] intheabovebillisnotenactedandis | |
26 | 26 | intendedtobeomittedfromthelaw.Matterinbold-facetypeintheabovebillisproposedlanguage. |