Provides a state supplement for public schools to hire a school nurse and a mental health professional
The bill outlines particular criteria that the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education will utilize to determine the need for school nurses and potentially mental health professionals. Key factors include the nurse-to-student ratio and the percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch. This framework is likely to provide a structured approach to distributing state funds where they are most needed, thereby enhancing the overall health and well-being of students across the state through improved access to health services.
House Bill 355 proposes financial assistance for public schools in Missouri to hire licensed school nurses and mental health professionals. This bill aims to enhance student health services in schools by providing state-funded supplements to employment costs for these essential health personnel. School districts will be allowed to apply for funding based on specific criteria, ensuring that those with the greatest need have the opportunity to strengthen their health services. The financial supplement is intended to not exceed the salary that the professional would earn according to the district's approved salary schedule, which also takes into account their experience.
In essence, HB355 represents a step towards recognizing the importance of health services in public education, particularly in the wake of increasing mental health challenges among students. By providing targeted financial support for hiring necessary professionals, the bill aims to facilitate better health outcomes for students and, potentially, reduce barriers to accessing these critical services.
Notably, there are provisions within the bill that allow school districts to utilize state supplements for telehealth services instead of hiring a full-time nurse or mental health professional. This aspect could lead to discussions about the appropriateness and effectiveness of telehealth compared to direct, in-person services. Supporters argue that this flexibility would allow schools to better meet their students' needs, while opponents may raise concerns about the adequacy of telehealth in addressing complex health issues that require a physical presence and interaction.