Missouri 2025 Regular Session

Missouri House Bill HB414 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.
OldNewDifferences
11 FIRSTREGULARSESSION
22 HOUSEBILLNO.414
33 103RDGENERALASSEMBLY
44 INTRODUCEDBYREPRESENTATIVEMURPHY.
55 1483H.01I DANARADEMANMILLER,ChiefClerk
66 ANACT
77 Torepealsection116.160,RSMo,andtoenactinlieuthereofonenewsectionrelatingto
88 constitutionalamendments.
99 BeitenactedbytheGeneralAssemblyofthestateofMissouri,asfollows:
1010 SectionA.Section116.160,RSMo,isrepealedandonenewsectionenactedinlieu
1111 2thereof,tobeknownassection116.160,toreadasfollows:
1212 116.160.1.Ifthegeneralassemblyadoptsajointresolutionproposinga
1313 2constitutionalamendmentorabillwithoutafiscalnotesummary,whichistobereferredtoa
1414 3voteofthepeople,afterreceiptofsuchresolutionorbillthesecretaryofstateshallpromptly
1515 4forwardtheresolutionorbilltothestateauditor.Ifthegeneralassemblyadoptsajoint
1616 5resolutionproposingaconstitutionalamendmentorabillwithoutanofficialsummary
1717 6statement,whichistobereferredtoavoteofthepeople,withintwentydaysafterreceiptof
1818 7theresolutionorbill,thesecretaryofstateshallprepareandtransmittotheattorneygenerala
1919 8summarystatementofthemeasureastheproposedsummarystatement.Thesecretaryof
2020 9statemayseektheadviceofthelegislatorwhointroducedtheconstitutionalamendmentor
2121 10billandthespeakerofthehouseorthepresidentprotemofthelegislativechamberthat
2222 11originatedthemeasure.Thesummarystatementmaybedistinctfromthelegislativetitleof
2323 12theproposedconstitutionalamendmentorbill.Theattorneygeneralshallwithintendays
2424 13approvethelegalcontentandformoftheproposedstatement.
2525 14 2.Ifthegeneralassemblyadoptsajointresolutionproposingaconstitutional
2626 15amendmentorstatutorymeasurethatincludesanofficialsummarystatement,the
2727 16statementshallappearontheballot,andnocourtshallhavetheauthoritytorewriteor
2828 17editthesummarystatementorballotlanguage.Ifsuchsummarystatementorballot
2929 EXPLANATION—Matterenclosedinbold-facedbrackets[thus] intheabovebillisnotenactedandis
3030 intendedtobeomittedfromthelaw.Matterinbold-facetypeintheabovebillisproposedlanguage. 18languageischallengedincourtandthecourtfindsthesummarystatementorballot
3131 19languagetobelegallyflawed,thegeneralassemblyshallrewriteoreditthestatementor
3232 20languageifthegeneralassemblyisinsessionatthetimeofthecourt'sruling.Ifsucha
3333 21court'srulingismadeatatimewhenthegeneralassemblyisnotinsession,the
3434 22secretaryofstateshallrewriteoreditthestatementorlanguage.
3535 23 [2.]3.Theofficialsummarystatementshallcontainnomorethanfiftywords,
3636 24excludingarticles.Thetitleshallbeatrueandimpartialstatementofthepurposesofthe
3737 25proposedmeasureinlanguageneitherintentionallyargumentativenorlikelytocreate
3838 26prejudiceeitherfororagainsttheproposedmeasure.
3939 âś”
4040 HB414 2