Proposes a constitutional amendment that modifies term limits for members of the general assembly and the number of members of the house of representatives
Impact
The proposed changes brought by HJR12 could have significant implications for the governance and political landscape in Missouri. By altering the legislative structure, the amendment aims to make the House of Representatives more representative of the state's changing demographics. The term limits modification would allow current members to serve longer, potentially fostering greater continuity and experience within the legislature. However, this could also raise concerns about the entrenchment of political power and reduce the opportunities for new candidates to emerge.
Summary
HJR12 is a proposed constitutional amendment aimed at revising the current term limits for members of the General Assembly in Missouri. The amendment seeks to repeal existing provisions in the Missouri Constitution that limit the number of terms a member can serve in the House of Representatives and the Senate. Specifically, it proposes to modify the structure of the House of Representatives by adjusting its membership count, setting it at one hundred sixty-three members, and then transitioning to one hundred three members after the 2030 census. This change is aimed at reflecting population shifts and ensuring that legislative representation aligns more closely with constituent needs.
Contention
The proposal is likely to generate considerable debate among lawmakers and the public. Supporters argue that extended term limits may lead to better governance due to the accumulation of experience and knowledge that can be leveraged over a longer period. However, opponents contend that such changes could entrench incumbents and reduce accountability, ultimately leading to a lack of fresh perspectives in the legislature. The issue of voter participation will also play a critical role in discussions, as those in favor may argue that the changes will enhance representation, while critics may raise questions about whether the amendment truly reflects the will of the electorate.
Proposes a constitutional amendment changing the membership of the conservation commission, the conservation sales and use tax, and the department of conservation's property tax exemption