Missouri House Bill HJR13

Missouri 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/8/25
• Refer: 5/15/25

Caption

Proposes a constitutional amendment that creates the department of the highway patrol

Impact

The introduction of HJR13 signifies a structural change in the way the Missouri government handles highway safety and traffic enforcement. By establishing a dedicated department, the bill aims to streamline operations and clarify the roles of highway patrol officers, potentially leading to improved road safety and traffic compliance. This is particularly noteworthy considering the growing concerns over road safety in Missouri, which could warrant a centralized entity focusing solely on these issues.

Summary

House Joint Resolution 13 (HJR13) proposes a constitutional amendment that aims to create a new Missouri Department of the Highway Patrol. This amendment will repeal Section 12 of Article IV of the Missouri Constitution and replace it with two new sections. The intent is to formalize the establishment of a central agency to oversee highway patrol responsibilities and enforce traffic laws, ensuring a structured and standardized approach to traffic safety and law enforcement across the state.

Contention

Debate surrounding HJR13 revolves around the implications of restructuring the highway patrol under a new administrative body. Some legislators express concerns regarding the potential bureaucratic growth and the effectiveness of a newly formed department. Critics argue that simply creating another government department may not address underlying issues related to road safety and could lead to redundancy. Conversely, supporters believe that a dedicated department will enhance accountability and operational efficiency, thus improving public safety.

Notable_points

The resolution's progression will require voter approval at the next general election or a special election called by the governor. This places significant responsibility on public opinion, as the electorate will need to consider both the merits and potential drawbacks of the proposed constitutional changes.