Proposes a constitutional amendment that modifies term limits for members of the general assembly
Impact
The passage of HJR2 would significantly alter the landscape of governance in Missouri by modifying term limits, which are designed to promote government accountability and enhance representation. Should the amendment be adopted by voters in the next general election, it would enable individuals with substantial legislative experience to serve extended terms. Supporters argue that longer tenures could lead to improved legislative stability and effectiveness, while critics express concerns about the risks of entrenchment and reduced turnover in the legislature.
Summary
HJR2 is a proposed amendment to the Missouri Constitution that seeks to repeal the current term limits for members of the General Assembly and establish new limits. The amendment stipulates that no individual may serve more than eight years in one house and a total of sixteen years in both houses. Additionally, the bill outlines specific provisions for counting prior service, ensuring that any time served before a set effective date would not be included in this total. The intention behind HJR2 is to change the existing term limits framework to potentially allow more experienced legislators to remain in office longer, provided they do not exceed the established limits.
Contention
Debates surrounding HJR2 are likely to focus on the balance between experience and accountability. Proponents posit that allowing legislators more time in office can lead to more robust policy-making, while opponents fear that it might diminish the diversity of ideas and perspectives within the assembly. Additionally, there is concern about the potential for career politicians to accumulate power, possibly leading to reduced responsiveness to constituents. The measure may instigate a sizable discussion on the values of representation and governance in Missouri, eventually culminating in a decisive voter referendum.