Missouri 2025 Regular Session

Missouri Senate Bill SB309 Latest Draft

Bill / Introduced Version Filed 12/06/2024

                             
FIRST REGULAR SESSION 
SENATE BILL NO. 309 
103RD GENERAL ASSEMBLY  
INTRODUCED BY SENATOR FITZWATER. 
0627S.01I 	KRISTINA MARTIN, Secretary  
AN ACT 
To amend chapter 67, RSMo, by adding thereto one new section relating to digital assets. 
 
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Missouri, as follows: 
     Section A.  Chapter 67, RSMo, is amended by adding thereto 1 
one new section, to be known as section 67.2060, to read as 2 
follows:3 
     67.2060.  1.  This section shall be known and may be 1 
cited as the "Blockchain Basics Act". 2 
     2.  As used in this section, the following terms mean: 3 
     (1) "Blockchain", data that is: 4 
     (a)  Shared across a network to create a ledger of 5 
verified transactions or information among network 6 
participants linked using cryptography to maintain the 7 
integrity of the ledger and to execute other functions; and 8 
     (b)  Distributed among network p articipants in an  9 
automated fashion to concurrently update network 10 
participants on the state of the ledger and any other 11 
functions; 12 
     (2)  "Blockchain protocol", any executable software 13 
deployed to a blockchain composed of source code that is 14 
publicly available and accessible including, but not limited 15 
to, a smart contract or any network of smart contracts; 16 
     (3)  "Consumer Price Index", the Consumer Price Index 17 
for All Urban Consumers (CPI -U) (1982-1984 = 100), not  18 
seasonally adjusted, as def ined and officially recorded by 19   SB 309 	2 
the United States Department of Labor, or its successor 20 
agency, from January first of the current year compared to 21 
January first of the preceding year; 22 
     (4)  "Digital asset", virtual currency, 23 
cryptocurrencies, nativ ely electronic assets including, but 24 
not limited to, stablecoins and nonfungible tokens, and 25 
other digital-only assets that confer economic, proprietary, 26 
or access rights or powers; 27 
     (5)  "Digital asset mining", using electricity to power 28 
a computer or node for the purpose of securing a blockchain 29 
network; 30 
     (6)  "Digital asset mining business", a group of 31 
computers working that consumes more than one megawatt of 32 
electricity for the purpose of securing a blockchain 33 
protocol; 34 
     (7)  "Discriminatory rates", the charging of rates for 35 
electricity that are substantially different from the rates 36 
charged for other industrial uses of electricity in similar 37 
geographic areas; 38 
     (8)  "Home digital asset mining", digital asset mining 39 
in an area zoned for residential use; 40 
     (9)  "Node", a computational device that does any of 41 
the following: 42 
     (a)  Communicates with other devices or participants on 43 
a blockchain to maintain consensus and integrity of that 44 
blockchain; 45 
     (b)  Creates and validates transaction blocks; or 46 
     (c)  Contains and updates a copy of a blockchain. 47 
A node does not exercise discretion over transactions 48 
initiated by the end user of the blockchain protocol; 49   SB 309 	3 
     (10)  "Self-hosted wallet", a digital interface used to  50 
secure and transfer digital assets under which the owner of 51 
the digital asset retains independent control over the 52 
digital assets that are secured by such digital interface; 53 
     (11)  "Staking", using a node to lock digital assets in 54 
order to operate the consensus mechanism of a blockchain 55 
protocol. 56 
     3.  The state shall not prohibit, restrict, or 57 
otherwise impair the ability of an individual to: 58 
     (1)  Use digital assets to purchase legal goods or 59 
services; or 60 
     (2)  Self-custody digital assets using a self-hosted  61 
wallet or third-party wallet. 62 
     4.  Digital assets used as a method of payment shall 63 
not be subject to any additional tax, withholding, 64 
assessment, or charge by the state or a political 65 
subdivision that is based solely on the use of the digital 66 
asset as the method of payment. 67 
     5.  Digital assets used as a method of payment shall 68 
not be subject to capital gains tax subject to a two -hundred- 69 
dollar limit per transaction.  The limitation amount shall 70 
be adjusted for inflation on January first annually based on 71 
the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index.  This  72 
subsection shall not be construed to prohibit the state or a 73 
political subdivision from imposing or collecting a tax, 74 
withholding, assessment, or charg e that would otherwise be 75 
offered if the transaction had taken place with United 76 
States legal tender. 77 
     6.  (1)  Neither the state nor a political subdivision 78 
thereof shall prohibit an individual from participating in 79 
home digital asset mining as lo ng as such individual 80 
complies with all local noise ordinances. 81   SB 309 	4 
     (2)  No political subdivision shall place any specific 82 
limit on sound decibels generated from home digital asset 83 
mining that is more restrictive than other limits set for 84 
sound pollution enforced by the political subdivision. 85 
     7.  (1)  Neither the state nor a political subdivision 86 
thereof shall prohibit a digital asset mining business from 87 
operating in any area zoned for industrial use provided they 88 
comply with all current ordin ances. 89 
     (2)  No political subdivision shall place any specific 90 
limit on sound decibels generated from a digital asset 91 
mining business that is more restrictive than other general 92 
limits set for sound pollution in areas zoned for industrial 93 
use. 94 
     8.  No political subdivision shall impose any 95 
requirement on a digital asset mining business that is not 96 
also a requirement for data centers in its jurisdiction. 97 
     9.  No political subdivision shall change the zoning of 98 
a digital asset mining busine ss without satisfying proper 99 
notice and comment requirements.  A digital asset mining 100 
business shall be able to appeal a change in zoning to a 101 
court with proper jurisdiction.  A judge shall find a 102 
violation of this section and nullify such a change in 103 
zoning if the judge determines the change was done to 104 
discriminate against a digital asset mining business. 105 
     10.  The public service commission may approve rates 106 
reflective of cost to serve but shall not approve a rate 107 
schedule for digital asset mi ning that creates  108 
discriminatory rates for digital asset mining businesses. 109 
     11.  Anyone engaged in home digital asset mining or a 110 
digital asset mining business shall not be considered a 111 
money transmitter under sections 361.700 to 361.727. 112 
     12.  The state shall not prohibit an individual from: 113   SB 309 	5 
     (1)  Operating a node for the purpose of connecting to 114 
a blockchain protocol or a protocol built on top of a 115 
blockchain protocol and transferring digital assets on a 116 
blockchain protocol; or 117 
     (2)  Participating in staking on a blockchain protocol. 118 
     13.  An individual or business operating a node or a 119 
series of nodes on a blockchain protocol shall not be 120 
required to obtain a money transmitter license under 121 
sections 361.700 to 361.727 to enga ge in such activity. 122 
     14.  No business offering to provide digital asset 123 
mining or staking services for individuals or to other 124 
businesses shall be considered as offering a security or 125 
investment contract under state law. 126 
     15.  Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the 127 
contrary, no individual or entity shall face liability 128 
related to a specific transaction merely by validating such 129 
transaction if such individual or entity: 130 
     (1)  Engages in digital asset mining; 131 
     (2)  Operates a node or series of nodes on a blockchain 132 
network; or 133 
     (3)  Provides digital asset mining or staking services 134 
for individuals or other businesses. 135 
