Missouri 2025 Regular Session

Missouri Senate Bill SJR15

Introduced
1/8/25  

Caption

Modifies provisions relating to jury trial waivers

Impact

The proposed changes in SJR15 are significant as they directly affect the constitutional right to trial by jury, specifically addressing procedural aspects in civil and criminal proceedings. By potentially lowering the number of jurors required for verdicts in civil trials and allowing jury waivers in criminal cases with mutual consent, this could streamline judicial processes. Supporters might argue that these modifications enhance judicial efficiency and flexibility. However, the impact on defendants' rights and protections in jury trials is substantial and warrants careful consideration from both lawmakers and the public.

Summary

SJR15, introduced by Senator Mosley, proposes an amendment to the Missouri Constitution concerning jury trials. This resolution aims to modify the existing legal framework regarding jury composition and the waiver of jury trials in both civil and criminal cases. The notable change allows for juries in courts not of record to consist of fewer than twelve citizens, as specified by law, and permits a two-thirds majority of that jury to render a verdict in civil cases. Additionally, it provides that defendants in criminal cases may waive their right to a jury trial if both the government and the court agree, allowing the case to be submitted directly to the court.

Contention

Debate surrounding SJR15 may focus on the implications of altering traditional jury practices. Critics could express concerns about the potential dilution of the right to a jury of one’s peers, arguing that reducing jury size may undermine the fairness and comprehensive nature of deliberations. Moreover, allowing defendants to waive their jury trial rights could lead to uneven applications of justice, particularly for marginalized groups who might not feel adequately represented in court settings without a jury's involvement. Thus, the bill raises important questions about the balance between judicial efficiency and the preservation of individual rights.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.