Places limitations on state spending
If enacted, SJR45 would significantly influence how the state allocates its budget by introducing a systematic cap on expenditures. It mandates that any new tax revenues or fees that don't exceed the established limit or receive voter approval be exempt from this calculation. Moreover, it stipulates that excess net general revenue collections exceeding the appropriations limit are to be refunded to taxpayers on a pro-rata basis. This aspect of the legislation emphasizes a tighter fiscal policy aimed at potentially returning surplus revenues directly to the citizens.
SJR45, introduced by Senator Carter, proposes an amendment to Article X of the Missouri Constitution that seeks to impose limitations on state spending. The resolution aims to establish an 'appropriations growth limit' based on the annual rate of inflation and the percentage change in Missouri's population. This amendment intends to ensure that state general revenue appropriations do not exceed the calculated growth limit, thus potentially curtailing excessive spending by the state. Voters will be asked to decide on this amendment in the next general election or potentially a special election called by the governor.
The proposal is likely to generate debate among legislators and the public regarding the implications of such spending controls. Supporters may argue that limiting state spending is essential for fiscal responsibility and accountability, allowing taxpayers to benefit when state revenues exceed forecasts. However, opponents may raise concerns that such stringent limitations could hinder the state’s ability to respond to emergencies, manage unforeseen expenditures, or fund critical public services. The process of establishing what constitutes 'emergency' spending may also be a point of contention, particularly concerning essential services like education, healthcare, and public safety.