Children's Promise Act; revise definition of "eligible charitable organization" under.
If passed, HB 655 will lead to a significant impact on the tax code regarding contributions to charitable organizations. It will allow tax credits for businesses and individuals contributing to organizations serving foster care and educational needs. The legislation places caps on the total amount of credits that can be allocated annually, which is set to increase gradually—capping at $18 million by the year 2023. This structured approach aims to create a balanced system to allocate funds without overwhelming the budget.
House Bill 655 aims to amend Section 27-7-22.41 of the Mississippi Code of 1972, which concerns income tax credits for contributions made by taxpayers to designated charitable organizations. The bill revises the definition of 'eligible charitable organization' to more explicitly include those involved with child welfare services, such as prevention and diversion programs under the Mississippi Department of Child Protection Services, and organizations providing educational services to at-risk children. It seeks to promote greater contributions to organizations that support vulnerable children's welfare through financial incentives.
Notably, the bill also stipulates that contributions made to these organizations will not be eligible for other tax credits or deductions, emphasizing the uniqueness of the credit system under this measure. Additionally, all organizations claiming eligibility must certify that they do not provide or fund abortion services, which may draw scrutiny from various advocacy groups. The amendments aim to ensure the funds generated through these credits are earmarked for specified educational and welfare services directly benefiting children.
Overall, HB 655 is positioned as a mechanism to support non-profit organizations that cater to children's needs in Mississippi, linking financial incentives to specific, socially vital objectives. However, the conditions outlined regarding what organizations can qualify and the limitations on fund allocation could dictate the practical effectiveness of this legislation in driving meaningful community support.