Mississippi 2023 Regular Session

Mississippi Senate Bill SB2492

Introduced
1/16/23  
Refer
1/16/23  
Engrossed
2/1/23  
Refer
2/7/23  

Caption

Electric vehicle charging; allow by non-utilities while maintaining consumer protections.

Impact

The amended statute distinguishes the role of non-utilities in the context of electric vehicle (EV) charging, allowing these entities to purchase electricity from public utilities solely for the purpose of providing charging services. This provision enables businesses, municipalities, and other organizations to set up charging stations without being classified as public utilities themselves, thus removing previous regulatory barriers while maintaining oversight to protect consumer interests. The bill's proponents argue that it represents a significant step forward in enhancing the state's EV capabilities and service options.

Summary

Senate Bill 2492 aims to amend the Mississippi Code related to electric vehicle charging by allowing non-utilities to provide charging services while ensuring consumer protections remain intact. This legislative change is intended to facilitate the growth of electric vehicle infrastructure in the state by permitting a broader range of service providers to engage in charging activities, thus promoting accessibility and convenience for electric vehicle users. The bill seeks to address growing concerns about the need for increased charging station availability, which is considered crucial for the state's energy transition and reduction of carbon emissions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB2492 appears largely supportive, attracting endorsements from various stakeholders who recognize the importance of expanding charging infrastructure in Mississippi. However, there are concerns regarding the potential implications for public safety and regulatory oversights related to consumer protections. Overall, the positive sentiment reflects a collective understanding of the necessity of adapting to changing energy consumption patterns and environmental sustainability efforts.

Contention

Despite the general support for the bill, some points of contention have surfaced, especially around the adequacy of consumer protections in light of new providers entering the market. Critics may worry that deregulating non-utilities could lead to a lack of accountability and standardization in charging services, potentially putting consumers at risk. The balance between innovation and oversight will be crucial as the state moves forward with implementing the bill, emphasizing the need for rigorous regulations to safeguard consumer interests while fostering a competitive electric vehicle charging market.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MS SB2134

Mississippi Consumers' Freedom of Choice in Appliances Act; enact.

MS HB1522

Public utilities; require owners or operators of to be responsible for maintaining underground lines up to the meter.

MS HB1060

Electric vehicles; authorize charging by nonutilities.

MS HB947

Utility Service; prohibit governmental entity from enacting any regulation that restricts the use of any appliance based on the type of.

MS SB2601

Utility Service; prevent government restrictions based on energy source required.

MS HB1583

Consumer Freedom of Choice in Appliances Act; create.

MS SB2433

Regulation of public utilities; exempt distribution of water by eligible homeowners association to its own residents from.

MS HB697

Homeowner associations that provide water to its residents, certain; prohibit PSC from providing certain regulation of.