State Health Plan; require co-pay for certain services under.
If passed, HB1367 will significantly alter the landscape of healthcare access for state employees and their dependents. The bill promotes the use of telehealth services, which is particularly relevant in modern healthcare by ensuring that these services are included under the coverage provisions. The legislation encompasses all types of medical visits except for those involving primary care doctors and certain telehealth services. By lowering out-of-pocket expenses at the point of care, the legislation is intended to encourage employees to seek timely medical attention and preventive care, thereby potentially reducing long-term healthcare costs for the state.
House Bill 1367 proposes an amendment to Section 25-15-9 of the Mississippi Code of 1972 regarding the State and School Employees' Life and Health Insurance Plan. The primary goal of this bill is to establish a standardized co-payment structure for state and school employees seeking medical care. Specifically, it mandates that employees will only need to pay a co-payment of thirty-five dollars ($35) or less for an initial visit with any in-network doctor or specialist, which will not be counted towards the employee's deductible. This change aims to improve access to healthcare services by lowering the initial financial barriers for medical consultations.
While the bill is likely to garner support for its intent to make healthcare more affordable, it may face scrutiny regarding its funding implications and the effect of such a mandate on insurance premiums. Some stakeholders might argue that limiting co-pays could result in higher overall costs for the state healthcare plan if not managed effectively. Additionally, there may be concerns about the adequacy of provider participation in the proposed co-payment system, especially in rural areas where access to specialists can be limited. Overall, while the bill outlines significant benefits for employees, it also raises questions about sustainability and the broader administrative implications for the state and school employees' health insurance management.