Mississippi 2024 Regular Session

Mississippi House Bill HB1624

Introduced
2/19/24  
Refer
2/19/24  
Engrossed
3/12/24  
Refer
3/22/24  
Enrolled
5/4/24  

Caption

Court-Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) Program; create state associate and standardize operations of local programs.

Impact

Upon enactment, HB1624 will enhance the framework that governs the CASA programs across the state, ensuring that there are minimum requirements for CASA volunteers and necessary support from the state CASA association. This includes the creation of a state-level CASA association to provide structure and support to local programs. The bill effectively aims to unify the approach towards advocacy for dependent children by creating a standardized method of operation, thus improving efficiency and effectiveness in addressing the needs of children in the legal system.

Summary

House Bill 1624 aims to establish state standards and operating procedures for local Court-Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) programs within Mississippi. The bill defines essential terms related to CASA programs and lays out the framework for the establishment and governance of local CASA programs by youth court judges. It mandates that local CASA programs be managed by a board of directors, which must provide oversight and ensure compliance with the standards set forth by the state CASA association. The bill ultimately seeks to improve the representation and advocacy for children experiencing abuse, neglect, or dependency within the court system.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB1624 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among advocates for child welfare. Supporters argue that the establishment of standardized procedures will not only empower CASA volunteers but will also enhance the quality of advocacy provided for vulnerable children. However, there may be concerns surrounding potential challenges in implementation or the ability of local boards to conform to state standards, as well as ensuring that funding and resources are adequate to support these programs effectively.

Contention

While most of the discussion surrounding HB1624 has been positive, there are logistical challenges acknowledged by critics regarding the potential burden on local programs to comply with newly established standards. Some stakeholders might raise concerns about the sufficiency of funding for the mandated training and operational support which could impact the program's reach and effectiveness. Furthermore, ongoing assessment of CASA program effectiveness and ensuring proper oversight will be critical to the bill’s success in achieving its goals of safeguarding children's interests in the court system.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MS HB1315

MS Youth Court Information Delivery System (MYCIDS); require audit of.

MS HB360

State Public Defender; revise certain powers and duties of.

MS HB1313

"Representative Bill Kinkade Fostering Access and Inspiring True Hope (FAITH) Scholarship Program Act"; create.

MS SB2267

Youth records; authorize member of Legislature to inspect upon written release.

MS SB2376

Youth court; clarify that disclosure of certain records in criminal matters do not require youth court approval.

MS SB2120

Abuse and neglect of a child; make certain amendments to procedure.

MS HB230

Chancey court; clarify authority to handle allegations of child abuse.

MS HB206

Chancery court; clarify authority to handle allegations of child abuse.