Squatted vehicles; prohibit modifications to motor vehicle which raise front fender a certain height above the rear fender.
The enactment of HB 349 will affect Mississippi's traffic law by establishing specific legal standards for vehicle modifications. It treats violations as misdemeanors, imposing fines that escalate based on the number of offenses. Initially, offenders will receive warning tickets, with penalties starting 180 days after the bill takes effect on July 1, 2024. Fines collected from violations will be directed into the State General Fund to support secondary school driver education programs, thus indirectly promoting safer driving practices among young drivers.
House Bill 349 aims to regulate modifications of passenger vehicles that result in the front fenders being raised four or more inches higher than the rear fenders—a visual alteration commonly referred to as 'squatting.' The bill creates Section 63-7-105 of the Mississippi Code of 1972, making it unlawful to drive such modified vehicles on public roads. Moreover, it allows for an exemption for vehicles equipped with high clearance fenders, to accommodate certain types of suspension systems. It also necessitates clear definitions of terms such as 'squatted vehicles' and outlines a measurement method for compliance.
The sentiment around HB 349 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among lawmakers who see the legislation as a means to ensure road safety and regulate a trend that has attracted public concern. By routing the generated fines toward driver education, the bill garners additional favor as a constructive measure in enhancing the educational landscape for new drivers. Nevertheless, some opposition voices express concerns that the bill may unduly penalize vehicle enthusiasts and raise questions about the enforcement and measurement of compliance with the height restrictions.
Key points of contention include the potential overreach into personal vehicle customization and the implications for vehicle owners who partake in legal modifications for off-road or practical purposes. Critics argue that defining 'squatted vehicles' could create arbitrary boundaries, and there are questions regarding the practicality of enforcement. Despite this, the bill's proponents believe that establishing clear regulations is necessary for public safety on busy highways.