Constitution; amend to define appropriation bill subject to Governor's partial veto power.
Impact
If enacted, this amendment would significantly alter the legislative landscape regarding funding and appropriations in Mississippi. Currently, the Governor can veto specific lines or conditions in an appropriations bill. By constraining this power, the proposal aims to ensure that the Legislature maintains greater control over how public funds are appropriated and managed. This change is poised to impact how funding decisions are made and could lead to greater legislative oversight in budgetary matters.
Summary
Senate Concurrent Resolution 529 proposes an amendment to Section 73 of the Mississippi Constitution of 1890, which pertains to the Governor's authority over appropriation bills. The bill seeks to eliminate the Governor's ability to veto conditions set within appropriations, thereby specifying that the partial veto power is limited to appropriation bills that designate a maximum amount payable from the State Treasury and remain in effect for a maximum of two months post-fiscal year. This proposed change is designed to clarify how the Governor's veto powers are exercised concerning financial appropriations made by the Legislature.
Contention
The proposed amendment arises from concerns highlighted in a recent Mississippi Supreme Court case, Reeves v. Gunn, which underscored ambiguities surrounding the types of appropriation bills the Governor could partially veto. Proponents of the bill argue that clear guidelines will enhance transparency and accountability, while critics may contend that limiting the veto power could reduce checks on legislative spending and fiscal responsibility. The adjustment sparked discussions on the balance of power between the legislative and executive branches, indicating potential political implications moving forward.