Mississippi 2025 Regular Session

Mississippi House Bill HB720

Introduced
1/15/25  
Refer
1/15/25  

Caption

Income tax; provide a credit for taxpayers who claim a federal income child tax credit.

Impact

The introduction of HB 720 is anticipated to have significant implications for state taxation, particularly in supporting families with children. It allows unused portions of the credit to be carried forward for up to five years, giving families more flexibility in managing their tax liabilities over time. This feature aims to reduce immediate tax burdens while also offering long-term financial planning opportunities for families that might not be able to utilize the full credit amount in a single year.

Summary

House Bill 720 proposes a state income tax credit for Mississippi taxpayers who are eligible to claim the federal income child tax credit. This initiative allows taxpayers to receive a credit of $200 for each child for whom they have claimed the federal tax credit, with the total credit capped at $1,000. The bill aims to alleviate some financial burdens on families by providing direct tax relief linked to already existing federal tax credits. Notably, taxpayers would need to submit proof of claiming the federal credit as part of their state tax filings to avail themselves of this benefit.

Conclusion

Overall, HB 720 reflects an effort to enhance the financial standing of families in Mississippi through strategic tax credit provisions. The link to federal tax credits reinforces a collaborative approach to taxation, while the carryforward provision underscores a thoughtful consideration of taxpayers' financial circumstances over multiple years. The ongoing legislative discourse will likely focus on balancing fiscal responsibility with the imperative to support family welfare in the state.

Contention

While the bill is positioned to offer financial support, it may raise discussions regarding its potential impacts on state revenue. Critics may question the financial feasibility of implementing such credits in light of the state’s budget priorities and economic conditions. Proponents argue that the added relief for families could spur consumer spending and contribute positively to the economy, suggesting that the benefits may outweigh any short-term fiscal costs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.