Mississippi House Bill HB913

Mississippi 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/17/25
• Refer: 1/17/25
• Engrossed: 1/29/25
• Refer: 2/17/25
• Enrolled: 4/7/25
• Passed: 4/17/25

Caption

Meat labeling; require accurate labeling of meat and nonmeat products by processors, retail and food establishment prior to final sale.

Impact

The enactment of HB 913 has significant implications for state laws pertaining to food labeling. By formalizing inspection processes and definitions related to meat products, the bill seeks to enhance the integrity of the food supply chain. It authorizes the Department of Agriculture to take enforcement actions against violators, which may include fines or revocation of business licenses. This creates a more robust regulatory framework intended to ensure compliance with food safety standards and consumer transparency about what products are being offered for sale.

Summary

House Bill 913 introduces stringent labeling requirements for meat and meat substitute products in Mississippi. The bill aims to prevent consumer confusion by establishing clear definitions and inspection protocols for food products marketed as meat. It mandates that the Department of Agriculture inspect food processing plants and retail establishments in response to credible complaints about misbranding, thereby reinforcing standards of food safety. The legislation also provides for civil penalties against entities that sell products incorrectly labeled as meat, positioning itself as a protective measure intended to uphold consumer rights.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 913 appears to be supportive among advocates for consumer rights and public health. Proponents emphasize the importance of accurate labeling in enabling consumers to make informed choices about their food. However, concerns have been raised about the potential burden this could place on businesses, particularly smaller food processing plants and retailers who may face challenges in meeting the new regulatory requirements. The discussion suggests a balancing act between consumer protection and the operational realities for food businesses in the state.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 913 include debates over how the bill's provisions may affect the availability and pricing of meat substitutes and other alternative proteins. Some stakeholders within the food industry argue that strict labeling could inadvertently classify innovative food products as misbranded, potentially stifling market growth for plant-based and cultivated proteins. These discussions highlight the ongoing tension between regulatory oversight aimed at consumer welfare and the need for a flexible environment that allows for the evolution of food products in response to changing consumer preferences.