Montana House Bill HB141

Montana 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/14/22
• Refer: 12/21/22
• Refer: 1/19/23
• Engrossed: 1/25/23
• Refer: 1/26/23
• Refer: 4/25/23
• Enrolled: 5/1/23
• Passed: 5/19/23

Caption

Revise Blackfeet mitigation fund laws

Impact

HB 141 significantly impacts state laws governing water rights, specifically those concerned with the Blackfeet Tribe's rights and mitigation efforts. By establishing a framework for how funds can be used from the mitigation account, the bill provides a clearer guideline for managing water resources and compensating local stakeholders affected by the development of tribal water rights. The enhanced financial support and concrete obligations towards mitigating water use impacts can lead to improved relations between the Blackfeet Tribe, state authorities, and local water users.

Summary

House Bill 141 seeks to revise the statutory appropriation language for the Blackfeet Tribe Water Rights Compact Mitigation Account. This bill amends Section 85-20-1504 of the Montana Code Annotated, setting parameters for the use of funds within the account specifically designated for mitigating impacts on water rights holders. The bill aims to allocate certain funds for grants and matching funds to various water right holders under state law for projects that are aimed at enhancing water availability and addressing economic and hydrologic impacts stemming from the recognition of Blackfeet Tribe's water rights under the compact.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 141 appears supportive, particularly among legislators and stakeholders concerned with the equitable distribution of water resources and rights. Those in favor of the bill view it as a constructive step towards ensuring that the impacts of tribal water rights are addressed in a manner that promotes fairness and cooperation among all parties involved. However, there may also be concerns raised regarding the effectiveness of the fund allocation and whether it will fully address all local concerns regarding water use.

Contention

Notable points of contention around this bill revolve around the allocation of funds and the potential prioritization of projects. Critics may argue about the sufficiency of the funds dedicated for mitigating impacts, specifically whether the amounts allocated will adequately cover the needs of all affected water right holders. Additionally, if there are disputes regarding interpretation or execution of grants and matching funds, this could lead to disagreements between the Blackfeet Tribe and other stakeholders.