Montana 2023 Regular Session

Montana House Bill HB486

Introduced
2/9/23  
Refer
2/13/23  
Engrossed
3/3/23  
Refer
3/13/23  
Enrolled
4/26/23  

Caption

Generally revise county road access laws

Impact

If enacted, HB 486 would significantly impact existing state laws related to highway management by increasing fines for failure to remove encroachments. The amendment raises the penalty from $10 to $100 per day for ongoing encroachments, thus incentivizing swift compliance from property owners. Furthermore, it empowers road supervisors and county surveyors by allowing them to take immediate action to remove such encroachments and commence legal proceedings to recover associated costs.

Summary

House Bill 486 aims to revise existing laws governing highway encroachments in the state of Montana. It facilitates individuals' ability to petition for the removal of encroachments that obstruct county roads. This legislation amends several sections of the Montana Code Annotated (MCA), thereby modifying the protocols and penalties associated with encroachments on public highways. By clarifying these processes, the bill seeks to promote accountability for property owners who allow their structures or other intrusions to infringe upon public roadways.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HB 486 appears to be supportive among legislators who favor stronger enforcement measures to maintain clear and accessible public highways. Proponents argue that the bill is necessary for public safety and vehicle accessibility. In contrast, there may be concern from property owners about increased financial burdens and the potential for disputes regarding what constitutes an encroachment. This balance of public safety versus property rights has generated spirited discussions.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the implications for private property rights and the criteria for what constitutes an encroachment. Some stakeholders may argue that the increased penalties could disproportionately affect individuals with financial challenges, leading to greater scrutiny of property boundaries and encroachment definitions. There are also worries about the adequacy of the petition process, potentially placing added stress on individuals seeking resolution to their concerns regarding highway access.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB830

State highways: encroachment permits: relocating or removing encroachments: public utility districts: County of Mendocino.

HI HB1363

Relating To Shorelines.

MT HB198

Provide for municipal authority regarding encroachments

CA AB1399

Department of Transportation: encroachment permits: broadband facilities.

CA AB955

Highways: encroachment permits: broadband facilities.

MT HB938

Generally revise encroachment permit law

CA SB445

Transportation: planning: complete streets facilities: sustainable transportation projects.

LA HB864

Provides relative to the removal or demolition of encroachments on state water bottoms