The bill has a significant impact on existing educational laws by revising Title 20, Chapter 7 of Montana’s statutes to disallow SEL in schools. Proponents of the bill argue that it protects students from what they perceive as potentially controversial or unproven educational practices. By eliminating SEL from the curriculum, the legislation aims to ensure that schools focus on traditional educational objectives. Critics, however, may express concerns that this prohibition limits educators' ability to address students' emotional and social needs, which can be critical for their overall development and mental health.
Summary
House Bill 688, introduced by L. Sheldon-Galloway, seeks to prohibit the implementation of social-emotional learning (SEL) within school districts in Montana. The bill explicitly forbids schools from promoting, purchasing, or utilizing SEL concepts for training teachers or instructing students. Under this legislation, any use of curricula related to SEL is made illegal, with the potential violation constituting 'gross neglect of duty' for educators and school staff. Furthermore, any infractions leading to reprimands will be reported to the education interim committee, enhancing accountability within educational institutions.
Contention
Key points of contention surrounding HB 688 focus on the definitions and implications of social-emotional learning. Supporters claim that the exclusion of SEL from educational frameworks is necessary to maintain control over educational content, while opponents may argue that removing these programs could hinder the essential skills students need for emotional well-being and interpersonal relationships. Additionally, the define scope of SEL as any program or policy utilizing school climate surveys raises questions about broader educational practices and accountability, suggesting a potential conflict between educational best practices and legislative limitations.
Public K-12 education; use and teaching of social-emotional learning concepts prohibited, parental consent required for certain surveys, violations constitute neglect of duty