Montana 2023 Regular Session

Montana House Bill HB742

Introduced
2/21/23  
Refer
2/22/23  
Engrossed
3/3/23  
Refer
3/13/23  
Enrolled
5/3/23  

Caption

Restrict use of restraints on youth

Impact

If passed, HB 742 would have a significant impact on state laws concerning juvenile court procedures. It would codify the existing practices regarding the treatment of young offenders, aiming to create a more humane legal environment for minors. The restrictions placed on the use of restraints could lead to changes in how law enforcement and legal professionals approach court proceedings involving youths, ensuring that these individuals are treated with the care and respect befitting their age and developmental status. By requiring written findings for any restraints ordered, the bill promotes accountability and transparency in the court's decision-making process.

Summary

House Bill 742 aims to restrict the use of restraints on youths during youth court proceedings, establishing clear guidelines regarding when and how restraints may be employed. The legislation determines that youth under the age of ten cannot be restrained under any circumstances. For youths aged ten or older, restraints can only be utilized if there is a court hearing supporting that it is necessary to prevent physical harm or to address a significant flight risk. This bill is intended to protect the dignity and psychological well-being of young individuals in the court system.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 742 appears largely positive among youth advocates, legal professionals, and mental health experts who argue that the use of restraints can be traumatizing and counterproductive to the rehabilitation of young individuals. Supporters of the bill view it as an important step towards promoting justice that is responsive to the needs of children. However, there remains some contention from those who are concerned about the implications of restricting restraints, particularly regarding courtroom safety and the potential risk posed by certain youths during proceedings.

Contention

A notable point of contention is the balance between ensuring courtroom safety and protecting the rights and mental health of youths involved in the justice system. While advocates for the bill emphasize the need to minimize trauma for young defendants, opponents express concerns that overly restrictive measures could compromise security in courtrooms. The debate reflects broader discussions about youth justice reform, with calls for more compassionate approaches versus the need for ensuring public safety in judicial proceedings.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MT HB2639

Prohibiting the use of restraints during hearings under the revised Kansas juvenile justice code unless restraints are deemed appropriate by the court.

MT HB475

Regulate restraints on women while giving childbirth

MT SB439

Prohibiting the use of restraints during hearings under the revised Kansas juvenile justice code unless restraints are deemed appropriate by the court.

MT HB2115

Prohibiting the use of restraints during hearings under the revised Kansas juvenile justice code unless deemed appropriate by the court.

MT SB110

Prohibiting the use of restraints during hearings under the revised Kansas juvenile justice code unless restraints are deemed appropriate by the court.

MT HB500

Eliminating youth court fees, costs, and certain fines and financial obligations

MT SB393

Relative to the use of restraints on pregnant women in the custody of a state or county correctional facility.

MT HB425

Generally revising laws rel. to restitution payments under the Youth Court Act

MT HB614

Generally revise youth court laws

MT HB44

Effective and Humane Treatment of Youth Act of 2023 or Kalief's Law This bill establishes requirements for the treatment of youth in the criminal justice system at the federal, state, and local levels. A youth is an individual who is 21 years of age or younger. At the federal level, the bill requires federal law enforcement officers to record youth custodial interrogations, limits the use of solitary confinement for youth at federal facilities, and limits the use of restraints on youth during federal court proceedings. At the state and local levels, the bill places conditions on existing grants and establishes a new grant to incentivize the implementation of similar policies with respect to youth. First, the bill reauthorizes the Juvenile Accountability Block Grant program for FY2023-FY2027. To be eligible for grant funds, state and local governments must implement policies that, with respect to youth, provide a right to speedy trial, provide a right to timely bail consideration, and restrict the use of solitary confinement. Second, a state or local government that receives funding under the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant program or the Community Oriented Policing Services program must implement policies and training on police-youth interaction. Third, the bill directs the Department of Justice to award grants to help state and local governments record youth custodial interrogations.

Similar Bills

CA AB878

Juveniles: restraints.

NH SB393

Relative to the use of restraints on pregnant women in the custody of a state or county correctional facility.

CA AB2657

Pupil discipline: restraint and seclusion.

IL HB5631

MHDDC-LETHAL RESTRAINTS-PROHIB

CA AB216

School safety: Pupil and Staff Safety Pilot Program.

CO HB1248

Protect Students from Restraint & Seclusion Act

TX SB751

Relating to the use of restraints in state schools.

NH HB491

Relative to prohibiting the use of the prone restraint for minors.