Montana House Bill HJ18

Montana 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/13/23
• Refer: 4/18/23
• Engrossed: 4/27/23
• Refer: 4/27/23
• Enrolled: 5/3/23
• Passed: 5/11/23

Caption

Joint resolution to study remediation of Smurfit-stone mill site

Impact

This resolution sets a framework for investigation into the historical pollution linked to the mill's operations, notably its discharges of dioxins, furans, and polychlorinated biphenyls into local waterways. The designation of the Environmental Quality Council to oversee this study demonstrates a proactive approach by the state to address lingering environmental hazards. Ultimately, findings from this study are expected to drive legislative actions aimed at restoring the mill site, mitigating risks to communities, and potentially reviving local economic prospects.

Summary

HJ18, a joint resolution from the Montana legislature, seeks to initiate an interim study focused on the remediation of the Smurfit-Stone mill site, which previously operated as a kraft pulp and paper mill from 1957 until its closure in 2010. The resolution is driven by concerns surrounding contamination at the site, which has affected both ecological health and community wellbeing. The proposal outlines the need for a comprehensive understanding of the extent of contamination, assessing both human health risks and environmental impacts to ensure informed future action on cleanup efforts.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HJ18 appears to reflect a collaborative recognition among lawmakers of the imperative to protect both the environment and public health. While there is general support for the study, opposing views may emerge concerning the speed and methods of remediation applied, especially in light of various stakeholder interests. The bill has garnered significant bipartisan backing, with a voting outcome that highlights the acknowledgment of the site’s historical significance and current risks posed to the surrounding communities.

Contention

Some notable points of contention may arise regarding the balance of economic interests versus environmental protections. Stakeholders involved in the mill's history might contest the necessity or methods of a thorough cleanup, fearing potential economic disruptions during remediation phases. Ongoing public health concerns emphasize the urgency of addressing these environmental hazards, while the legislative process might be scrutinized for its implications on local oversight and management of such cleanup activities, which could lead to further debates in the future.