Montana Senate Bill SB523

Montana 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/21/23
• Refer: 3/22/23
• Engrossed: 4/4/23
• Refer: 4/5/23
• Failed: 5/8/23

Caption

Generally revise tax increment financing laws

Impact

SB523 introduces significant changes regarding how tax increment financing is calculated and applied. Most notably, it proposes eliminating school levies from the calculation of tax increments and imposes a limit of 30 years on the duration of TIF provisions, thereby influencing municipal financial strategies. The provisions also control the administrative costs that can be funded through tax increment and prohibit the use of tax increments for land acquisition, redirecting the focus on infrastructure improvements such as road construction.

Summary

Senate Bill 523 aims to revise and update the existing laws surrounding tax increment financing (TIF) in Montana. The bill mandates that any tax increment financing provision or bond issuance must be approved by the qualified electors in the affected urban renewal areas or targeted economic development districts. This democratic approach aims to enhance local governance and ensure that decisions affecting local taxation and economic developments are made by the directly involved communities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB523 appears to be mixed. Proponents argue that involving local electors in decisions about tax policy and urban development will empower communities and lead to more responsible governance. However, some critics express concerns that removing school levies from tax computations could adversely affect educational funding, arguing that the bill may prioritize development over funding essential services.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the overall potential for reduced funding for local schools and the restrictions placed on local governments regarding tax increment financing. The requirement for public hearings and local approval may delay the execution of needed projects, creating friction between those advocating for swift economic development and those cautious about how these changes could affect long-term fiscal health and local autonomy.